Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California seeks constitutional convention over Citizens United
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | June 25, 2014 | by Bob Egelko

Posted on 06/25/2014 3:28:27 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

SAN FRANCISCO -- There hasn't been a U.S. constitutional convention in 225 years, and it would take a daunting number of states, 34, to call another one.

That didn't deter Democratic legislators this week from making California the second state, after Vermont, to demand a nationwide gathering of delegates for a single purpose: to propose an amendment repealing the Supreme Court's 2010 decision that allowed unlimited corporate spending on political campaigns.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: scotus

1 posted on 06/25/2014 3:28:27 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Figures.


2 posted on 06/25/2014 3:31:16 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Seriously why do they care? It doesn’t matter how much money Republicans have, they are dog turds under the heel of the rat machine (see Meg Whitman)


3 posted on 06/25/2014 3:33:23 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
If the proposed amendment were to eliminate all corporate political contributions, then I would be heartily in favor. Let's make it so that only private, US citizens can contribute to political figures. No bundling and no foreigners. Maybe even limit it to registered voters only.
No, I'm not naive enough to believe it will actually happen...
4 posted on 06/25/2014 3:33:48 PM PDT by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It is horrifying that the Democratic Party wants to use the Constitution to weaken Americans’ civil rights.


5 posted on 06/25/2014 3:35:36 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

They don’t like any of the Bill of Rights


6 posted on 06/25/2014 3:35:56 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

All that California has to do is make it impossible to do business in California and then no California businesses will be able to afford (or will even be around) to contribute to campaigns.


7 posted on 06/25/2014 3:37:30 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Until the Liberals are ready to answer the specific question as to who the online donors were to the Obama presidency, and how much, they really don’t have much credibility asking for limits on campaign spending. The Liberals cry wolf so often it’s hard to take them seriously any more.


8 posted on 06/25/2014 3:37:43 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Democrats only want the filthy union money in politics because most of that always goes to them.


9 posted on 06/25/2014 3:37:46 PM PDT by Bullish (You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

We might get an Article V convention after all.... to dump freedom of speech


10 posted on 06/25/2014 3:38:29 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Agreed. They certainly don't like the 2nd Amendment. But they're not trying to change the Constitution from guaranteeing the right to keep and bear arms to prohibiting the right to keep and bear arms. Make no mistake what they're doing. They want to prohibit certain political speech. They want to change the guaranteed right of free speech into something that prohibits certain speech.

Simply horrifying.

11 posted on 06/25/2014 3:38:32 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

I assume that “corporate” includes labor unions.


12 posted on 06/25/2014 3:44:02 PM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Elsiejay

Read it again.


13 posted on 06/25/2014 3:45:02 PM PDT by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Obviously the writer of this article is incapable of READING, if so he would know that there has been a push for this exact thing , and a lot of states have already notified Congress and passed legislation in their States to do Just that, I believe there are enough States already, or pretty damned close, but the issue is to Stop Big Government, not the CITIZENS, Which is why California WILL NOT be a part of the process in the very near future.


14 posted on 06/25/2014 3:49:40 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
...for a single purpose...

Yeah, good luck with that.

One of the reasons there has never been an Article V Constitutional Convention is because once you call one there is no way to limit what they do. They can vote to re-write the entire Constitution if they want (except they are specifically prohibited from depriving any state, without its consent, "of its equal suffrage in the Senate").

Of course, whatever comes out of the Convention has to then be ratified by 3/4 of the states, which is another reason why there has never been one.

15 posted on 06/25/2014 4:08:22 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

If they hold a convention, is it limited to only one amendment/topic, or can many more amendments be considered and/or passed?
I’m thinking along the lines of the ones Mark Levin’s book proposed.


16 posted on 06/25/2014 6:00:48 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ill trade you, striping the concept of citizenship from a corporation for a restoration of the 10th Amendment.


17 posted on 06/25/2014 6:09:13 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

It doesn’t really matter, democrats don’t control enough states to ratify an amendment.

That being said we could bargon. it is an insane idea to let government(thus inevitably its political leaders) get in the business of regulating their competition, but a deal could be made to let them do it at the State level.

Their States will turn themselves into despotic dictatorial hellholes, and we will leave the union.


18 posted on 06/25/2014 6:13:06 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

California is also the state that wanted to give police an unlimited right to access every bit of data on your cell phones and tablets, including access to your cloud data, without first obtaining a search warrant. The Supreme Court voted unanimously that California was wrong.


19 posted on 06/26/2014 3:42:49 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Citizens do not lose their rights when they join with other citizens in a legally incorporated economic enterprise. In fact, the civil rights of each and all of them lodges in and is bestowed upon the corporation, collectively.


20 posted on 06/28/2014 1:11:38 PM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson