Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

“Is it harassment, one wonders, for Eleanor McCullen to ask a woman, quietly and politely, two times, whether she will take literature or whether she has any questions?” he asked. “Three times? Four times? It seems to me far from certain that First Amendment rights can be imperiled by threatening jail time (only at 'reproductive health care facilit[ies],' of course) for so vague an offense.”

Scalia understands that the Big Murder wants to extinguish any opposition.

1 posted on 06/27/2014 5:54:16 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coleus; narses; Salvation; NYer
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 06/27/2014 5:55:06 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 06/27/2014 5:55:50 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The justices make an excellent point on the content of speech. Who would decide weather a person was pro-abortion escort or an anti-abortion protestor based on their rhetoric?
Couldn’t a person serving as an escort, gently lead a young pregnant woman to the clinic door while saying, “come along now deary, let’s get you safely into the clinic where they can (insert your most graphic description of abortion here).


5 posted on 06/27/2014 6:38:38 AM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I must be particularly dense this morning.

If the ruling was unanimous, and the buffer-zone law was struck down, against what is Scalia railing?


7 posted on 06/27/2014 6:45:22 AM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Justice Scalia wrote in a concurring opinion joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

Wut? Is Justice Kennedy trying to redeem himself?

12 posted on 06/27/2014 8:31:23 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("The commenters are plenty but the thinkers are few." -- Walid Shoebat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

John Roberts: The FAIL that keeps on failing


20 posted on 06/27/2014 7:04:06 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson