[expat2]

I think the problem is that the pro-gun folks made a hash of their case. Some had no standing and none was able show that they were harmed by the law.

They should get their act together, with folks who have both standing and a likelihood of being harmed, and try again.

[Red Steel]

We get tortured logic like this to support her predetermined opinion.

The question of whether Ms. Dahlberg is suffering a continuing injury is a close one, because it is not clear when Ms. Dahlberg’s magazines are likely to need replacement and whether, at that indeterminate point in future, she will desire to replace them with magazines of similar type. Notwithstanding her current interests, with the passage of time, Ms. Dahlberg’s desire to carry large-capacity magazines may change If that happened, this statute would not affect her.

No judge she's not going to change her mind being a plaintiff in this lawsuit and all that.