Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Mitch McConnell Crushed Barack Obama At The Supreme Court (Mitch the Lion)
yahoo finance ^ | 6/28/2014 | Brett LoGiurato

Posted on 06/28/2014 9:57:41 PM PDT by sickoflibs

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: sickoflibs

Yertel the turtle.


21 posted on 06/29/2014 1:10:55 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Sing along with Mitch.


22 posted on 06/29/2014 1:58:30 AM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: sickoflibs

The President has a phone, a pen and a dictatorial streak, doesn’t he?


24 posted on 06/29/2014 6:39:45 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal (Go, Cruz! Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Barak lost royally which means his attorney general also lost royally. Guess who goes under the bus next.

And this 9-0 decision isn't even phasing Barak. It's all about all those Union doings under that "phony" administration that he created.

25 posted on 06/29/2014 8:10:18 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Since the appointees never held their title, all actions would be null and void.


26 posted on 06/29/2014 8:11:41 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
-- I suppose stating facts of how the law suit was planned and executed could be called "promoting"! --

As far as I know, the only thing McConnell and company produced was a friend of the court brief. The lawsuit was initiated by companies challenging rulings made by the NLRB.

27 posted on 06/29/2014 8:13:57 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
-- And this 9-0 decision isn't even phasing Barak. --

Momentary grammer nazi ... Fazing.

Of course Obama isn't fazed by this. The Senate cured the deficiency some time ago.

28 posted on 06/29/2014 8:17:08 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks...very tired...flu for two days...lost 5 lbs....very weak....brain is mush.


29 posted on 06/29/2014 8:23:05 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Recess appointments were the means of overcoming a Senate filibuster of Presidential nominees. It provided a means of trumping the minorities ability to block Administration behavior and to force some accommodation of the minorities wishes. It had to be used sparingly, but Obama overreached and sought to apply recess appointments at will, rendering moot the Senate role in confirmation.

The SC restored the Senate’s power of confirmation, but in the meantime, the Senate changed its rules so that whoever controls the Senate may confirm most nominees with a simple majority. Reid can give Obama all of his nominees back and they can approve all of the invalid cases at their first meeting before coffee break time.


30 posted on 06/29/2014 8:30:15 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; mickie; pax_et_bonum; Maine Mariner; flaglady47
"Barak lost royally which means his attorney general also lost royally."

Barack and his AG, Eric the Red, had their heads together plotting the recess appointments....with Holder giving his go-ahead to the unconstitional intents of his boss.

Yet, no one in the media or in the GOP PR division evidently ties him in with Obama's criminal act, i.e., Holder is never mentioned in any follow-up news articles regarding the Supremes' decision.

Rush's famous theorum in action again, this time applying to an Obenedict underling.

Both Obama and Holder may have lost "royally", but few of the serfs will ever know it...or care. They probably don't even know what a "recess appointment" is...and who knows or cares about the NLRB, anyhow!

Now, if it was the NBA or the NFL, the court's decision would have received a lot more attention.

Leni

31 posted on 06/29/2014 8:32:11 AM PDT by MinuteGal (The Infernal Revenue Service - forever to be known as the BS-IRS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Hope you are feeling better, if not right now, then very soon. And, FWIW, what prompted me to reply to your earlier post was the substance, not the usage!


32 posted on 06/29/2014 8:33:11 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

A smack down for 0bunghole’s occupation government


33 posted on 06/29/2014 10:08:44 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

-——it should nullify every single action——

Further, since the apointments were illegal, all salaries and bonuses must be refunded


34 posted on 06/29/2014 10:18:35 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

35 posted on 06/29/2014 10:22:35 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/17412-when-a-recess-is-not-a-recess-obama-vs-article-ii


36 posted on 06/29/2014 11:02:12 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
I believe I heard that this is the twelfth unanimous ruling against Obama by the SC. They are so obvious that even the liberal females can still see justice at least from time to time.
37 posted on 06/29/2014 7:53:55 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

He’s a Patton reborn.


38 posted on 06/30/2014 6:49:03 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson