Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, Losing One Battle Doesn’t Mean We Have Lost The War
Townhall.com ^ | June 30, 2014 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 06/30/2014 4:14:28 AM PDT by Kaslin

I was furious that Thad Cochran slimed his way to victory, but every time we hardcore conservatives lose a battle, it seems a contingent of bitter-enders starts up about how the Republicans and Democrats are exactly the same, and how they’ll refuse to vote in the general, and how they’ll take their collective ball and go home.

That’s crazy talk. We can get even with the GOP establishment later; we need to beat the Democrats first.

Now, many of my good friends disagree with me here, but I respect them enough to say what I think. And I think that when we focus on the establishment’s antics in Mississippi instead of focusing on November, we make Barack Obama happier than if he got to play 18 holes with the ghost of Karl Marx.

Let us assume that Thad Cochran didn’t play fair. Now let me assume the role of your father:

Life is not fair.

Yeah, I was shocked – shocked! – that our opponents refused to commit ritual suicide in order to allow our chosen candidate to waltz into the nomination that, a couple weeks ago, was his for his taking. Was anyone expecting the establishment to go quietly, to rollover, to not use every tool at its disposal to hold on to power?

We’re conservatives. We’re not supposed to make excuses, but I’m sure hearing a lot in the wake of Cochran’s win.

Yeah, his win. News Flash: Thad Cochran got more votes than our guy. That means our guy failed to perform the most important function of a conservative politician.

He failed to win.

Hell, he couldn’t handle the GOP establishment calling him a racist. Why does anyone imagine he could have handled the Democrats doing it in November? They’re the pros!

Yeah, Cochran dared to appeal to Democrats…who voted for him. It would be nice to have other Republicans embrace this innovative concept.

Am I happy about the slanders Cochran’s buddies spread, or about the way the K Street crew spent zillions to keep Thad awake and away from the livestock long enough to get nominated?

No, but that ship has sailed and sank. Winners leverage their assets into victory.

Am I suggesting that we forgo our vengeance? Never! I’m all about payback. But getting even with these K Street creeps can wait. I say defeat the Democrats first. Instead of choosing to fight two opponents at once, we can deal with these establishment tools later from a position of strength when Reid’s reign is just a bad memory.

I’m getting sick of this quitter talk about how we can’t possibly win, about how everyone’s against us, about how this struggle being hard is some sort of cosmic injustice perpetrated upon us by mysterious forces beyond our control.

George Washington and his men ate their damn shoes as they shivered in Valley Forge. That’s adversity, not having to somehow find the strength to carry on after nominating a Republican who is sure to win in November and has a mere 88 percent conservative rating.

This isn’t about our feelings. This isn’t about our “principles” either. There is no principle that compels us to allow Barack Obama to retain a Senate majority that absolutely will confirm a Supreme Court justice who will absolutely vote to:



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last
To: Black Agnes

That’s already started, here on FR.


41 posted on 06/30/2014 5:40:43 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Vote for Thad Cochran, continue to get scuzzbag candidates like Thad Cochran.

To Hell with Thad Cochran and his socialist cronies in the GOP leadership! He won the primary runoff by appealing to the racism and greed of the urban Parasite Class ... let the urban Parasite Class vote for him. Or not. He does not represent the Productive Class or the Protective Class. He's worse than a democrat.

Thad Cochran delenda est.

42 posted on 06/30/2014 5:40:50 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

It’s all they have left, once they know they’ve lost the argument.


43 posted on 06/30/2014 5:42:10 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

I’ve already been called a Klukker for thinking $17T in debt was unsustainable.

I await their further insults...


44 posted on 06/30/2014 5:42:28 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java; Black Agnes

Yea, remember the thread from the other night, when a couple of Cochran shills characterised our reaction as “hurt feelings”? They really do see this as a football game, only both sides play for the same team, just different jerseys.


45 posted on 06/30/2014 5:47:26 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BinaryBoy

Yes same old crap. It’s not Republican vs Democrat, it is the aristocracy vs us. Wake up


46 posted on 06/30/2014 5:48:57 AM PDT by rocketmag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel; wardaddy

My grandmother was involved in the civil rights movement. No way I’m voting for someone who calls me a Klukker for thinking $17T in debt is unsustainable.


47 posted on 06/30/2014 5:50:17 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Win influence.


48 posted on 06/30/2014 5:53:46 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

The reason why conservatives don’t win is because instead of uniting like the left, they divide. Don’t blame the left, blame yourself


49 posted on 06/30/2014 5:54:05 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

Or someone who demonises hos own purported side (conservatives) for obstructing the enemy’s agenda. That’s what an opposition party is supposed to do, but what would Cochran and his ilk know about obsteucting the left’s agenda? And these are the people we simply “must” have take the Senate? So they can do just what the rats would do, and use our support to do it?


50 posted on 06/30/2014 5:54:45 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

Like this?:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/12/03/Boehner-GOP-leaders-purge-conservatives-from-powerful-House-committees


51 posted on 06/30/2014 5:54:56 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Your mypopia inhibits you.

There is no acceptance of rule breaking. There is only the statement that it is childish and stupid to hurt ourselves badly only to hurt an opponent slightly if at all. Yes, that’s a fundamental principle off political success.

Cochran will retire in a few years. He isn’t even aware of the world he’s senile. It’s the machine in MS that is as bad as the machine in Chicago we need to hurt.

Considering the school of thought that is common here - that the GOPE is the same as the Dems - how does electing Dems hurt the GOPE? It doesn’t. It hurts us.


52 posted on 06/30/2014 5:54:58 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Precisely.

And calling me ‘childish, illiterate, ignorant and inbred’ (read some of the posters here and elsewhere) isn’t going to get me to pull the lever in November.

Sorry.


53 posted on 06/30/2014 5:56:15 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SpeakerToAnimals

LOL I’m not promoting republicans. Need I remind you of what happened when republicans had both houses and the executive?

I would not be surprised a bit if Cochran loses in November [although I hope there is a re-do in MS that elects McDaniel.] But I will be disappointed if “R” does not take the senate and Harry Reid can still protect 0bama.

Even if the majority is tenuous in number and purity, it’s better than no majority. Ted Cruz and Mike Lee’s strength would be multiplied. That’s what I want. Dunno about you.....


54 posted on 06/30/2014 5:59:50 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

Influence to do what? Remember the last government shutdown, when out of all those Republicans, only Ted Cruz and a couple of others tried to use our leverage to block more spending? Who did the rest of the Republicans berate? McCain called him and the TP “wacko bords”. The Congressional GOP went after Cruz with an energy which they never exert in opposing Obama.

They also support amnesty.

Influence to do what?


55 posted on 06/30/2014 5:59:52 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
To Hell with Thad Cochran and his socialist cronies in the GOP leadership! He won the primary runoff by appealing to the racism and greed of the urban Parasite Class ...

He won by cheating.

56 posted on 06/30/2014 6:00:58 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I can not vote for such a man.

Everyone has their line in the sand, or at least they should, IMO. I respect people for that.

What some folks don't get though is that the GOPe have been moving that line for decades.

"No! The 'conservative' line is here....no wait, it's here. Just a little further....."

Etc, etc, etc.

I guess you just have to stick around long enough to notice it.

57 posted on 06/30/2014 6:01:32 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“We can get even with the GOP establishment later; we need to beat the Democrats first.”

Nope, sorry, we need to destroy the barbarians within the walls before we have a chance to defeat the ones at the gates.

Destroy the current gop - it is only taking nutrients and sunshine that is needed by a true conservative party.

The gop has had its chances, provided by conservative voters holding their noses. With those chances, the gop has done.....(crickets).....that’s right, nothing, zip, nada.

The gop establishment is holding back the conservative movement, and worse, they pretend to be conservative while eagerly jumping into the back seat of every liberal jalopy and hoisting their skirts.

Get rid of the faithless whores, and build a conservative party. I’ve brought my last party slut home to meet Mom and Dad.

Vote for the gop establishment? HA! How many times will you forgive your adulterous wife? I’ve done so at least every other year since Reagan’s last term. I’ve decided she is just a round-heeled tramp who will always let any liberal wanker have his way with her. She’s not going to change. I’d rather have an empty bed than to smell the musk of randy dems on her every night!


58 posted on 06/30/2014 6:01:42 AM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled
stupid to hurt ourselves badly only to hurt an opponent slightly if at all. Yes, that’s a fundamental principle off political success.

Which is exactly what Cochran and his supporters did to conservatives, and it's not the first time, They oppose conservatives with much more zeal than they ever show in opposing Hussein, and Cochran came right out and told those black rat voters that they could blame "racist" conservatives for obstructing Obama. So wht's he going to do?
59 posted on 06/30/2014 6:04:00 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Principled

The likes of Cochran won’t multiply Cruz’s and Lee’s strength. Remember the last government shutdown, when McCain publicly called Cruz and TP wacko birds? This is the same man who said that Hussein would make a good president.


60 posted on 06/30/2014 6:06:56 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson