I think the computer stuff is EXTREMELY damning.
Yes, it may well be. But the prosecution presented no verifiable evidence regarding times, dates, which website, which search engine, whether he specifically ‘search termed it’ or clicked on a link, which anything - only “that he did it.”
They’re gonna have to show in excruciating detail at trial and that’s a good thing. They’re gonna have to show a lot of things that this detective just talked around. I think he should answer to some level of what he or she might have done, I just wonder about the murder thing - the detective did not reassure me everything is on the up and up.