Skip to comments.
North Carolina voter law challenged: 'the worst suppression since Jim Crow'
The Guardian ^
| July 6 2014
| Ed Pilkington
Posted on 07/06/2014 7:58:44 AM PDT by PoloSec
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Look over there under that rock, on that sign, in that recipe everywhere RACISM RACISM RAISM!
1
posted on
07/06/2014 7:58:44 AM PDT
by
PoloSec
To: PoloSec
This means every country in the world is racist
2
posted on
07/06/2014 8:01:01 AM PDT
by
Viennacon
(Rebuke the Repuke!)
To: PoloSec
Which federal judge has the case? That will tell you the outcome..it’s preordained..
3
posted on
07/06/2014 8:02:55 AM PDT
by
ken5050
("One useless man is a shame, two are a law firm, three or more are a Congress".. John Adams)
To: PoloSec
You need an ID for everything in this country except to vote!
4
posted on
07/06/2014 8:02:56 AM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: PoloSec
Expect a bunch of voter Id laws to bite the dust before the Nov elections , probably by the same judges that over turned the same sex marriage bans
5
posted on
07/06/2014 8:03:20 AM PDT
by
molson209
(Blank)
To: Viennacon
Even South Africa requires an I.D.!
These freaks are even against dipping your finger in ink like they do there as well.
6
posted on
07/06/2014 8:06:03 AM PDT
by
VanDeKoik
To: PoloSec
Do they need identification to qualify for their EBT cards?
To: VanDeKoik
Resist finger inking we much!
8
posted on
07/06/2014 8:06:56 AM PDT
by
Viennacon
(Rebuke the Repuke!)
To: PoloSec
This is about Kay Hagan and nothing else. They’re doing what they can to protect that senate seat.
9
posted on
07/06/2014 8:07:01 AM PDT
by
cotton1706
(ThisRepublic.net)
To: VanDeKoik
10
posted on
07/06/2014 8:08:47 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
To: PoloSec
These laws are ridiculous.
How do they expect new illegals to vote with this kind of restriction?
It takes time to get a bogus ID - just ask Obama.
And how do they expect Holders People to be able to vote multiple times if they have to show an ID?
If they only get paid for voting one time they won’t even make enough to bother getting up in the morning .
11
posted on
07/06/2014 8:11:45 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(The Obamas Black skin has morphed into Teflon thanks to the Obama Media)
To: molson209
Expect a bunch of voter Id laws to bite the dust before the Nov elections , probably by the same judges that over turned the same sex marriage bansThey're on a roll!
To: PoloSec
You mean liberal blacks are only getting 3 votes a pieces, on average?
13
posted on
07/06/2014 8:14:42 AM PDT
by
Old Yeller
(Anything is possible, if you don't know what you're talking about.)
To: PoloSec
This is the worst voter suppression law we have seen since the days of Jim Crow. It is a full-on assault on the voting rights of minorities, said Reverend William Barber, president of the North Carolina state conference of the NAACP. Pure hyperbole from the good reverend. Since getting an ID is easier than buying a bottle of cheap wine and since applying for government benefits requires one, the NAACP is clearly worried about something else. That something else is the massive voter fraud that is ongoing in North Carolina. It's much harder to win when you have to actually get an eligible voter to the polls to cast a ballot.
To: McGavin999
Put their picture on their EBT card.
Two problems solved.
15
posted on
07/06/2014 8:17:43 AM PDT
by
Scrambler Bob
(You can count my felonies by looking at my FR replies.)
To: PoloSec
16
posted on
07/06/2014 8:25:25 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: McGavin999
Do they need identification to qualify for their EBT cards?Don't know about NC, but here in SC, yes.
17
posted on
07/06/2014 8:27:46 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(Everyday, Joe Wilson becomes more correct!)
To: PoloSec
India has 1.26 billion people, of whom about 37% live in poverty. The per capita income is less than 3% of that of the United States.
Every voter has a government issued picture ID.
To: PoloSec
From the article:
Rosanell Eaton, the lead plaintiff in this weeks legal challenge to HB 589, was born in 1921 and remembers the literacy test. This year, she faces losing her right to vote under the new act because the name on her birth certificate doesnt tally with that on her driving licence.
Well, Ms. Eaton, I suggest you go about correcting that. It's YOUR problem, not mine.
Besides, the election officials aren't going to compare your DL with your BC. I strongly suspect if you present your DL, you'll be allowed to vote, no problem.
Mountain out of a molehill.
19
posted on
07/06/2014 8:32:18 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(Everyday, Joe Wilson becomes more correct!)
To: PoloSec
It seems to me that if you can take thirty voters and make them 90 and get paid for the results you are going to move Heaven and Earth to keep that cash flow going. This is the reason voter ID laws are so threatening to the “leaders” who bring the suits.
20
posted on
07/06/2014 8:40:19 AM PDT
by
billhilly
(Its OK, the left hated Bush.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson