Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA and Boeing finalize $2.8 million deal to build super powerful rocket
Space Daily ^ | Jul 4, 2013 | Brooks Hays

Posted on 07/08/2014 3:48:24 PM PDT by robowombat

NASA and Boeing finalize $2.8 million deal to build super powerful rocket by Brooks Hays Washington Jul 4, 2013

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only Aviation company Boeing has contracted with NASA to build the world's most powerful rocket, intended -- eventually -- to propel astronauts to the moon, Mars, asteroids and the deep space beyond.

Boeing and NASA signed a $2.8 million contract this week, tasking the aerospace company with developing two rocket cores as part of the completion of the Space Launch System, a heavy launch vehicle meant to carry both crew and cargo that will be upgraded over time.

"Our teams have dedicated themselves to ensuring that the SLS -- the largest ever -- will be built safely, affordably and on time," promised Virginia Barnes, Boeing's Space Launch System vice president and program manager.

The contract agreement comes after the space agency reviewed and approved Boeing's SLS core stage designs, a major milestone for the system. The last time NASA completed a critical review of a deep-space human rocket, the year was 1961 and the space agency was on its way to building the Saturn V, the vehicle that would eventually launch the first men to walk the moon.

"The SLS program team completed the core stage critical design review ahead of schedule and continues to make excellent progress towards delivering the rocket to the launch pad," said Todd May, NASA's SLS program manager. "Our entire prime contractor and government team has been working full-steam on this program since its inception."

The two SLS rockets will be even more powerful than the Saturn V. The first version, which is set to launch in 2017 carrying an unmanned Orion capsule, will stand 321 feet tall, weigh 5.5 million pounds and be boosted by four hydrogen-fueled engines left over from the now extinct space shuttle program.

Scientists and engineers have criticized the agency for incorporating spare parts and outdated technology in their construction plans.

The second rocket will be taller and more powerful. Standing 384 feet tall and weighing 6.5 million pounds, the second version will launch a manned mission in 2021 using more powerful J-2X engines and strap-on boosters.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boeing; moon; nasa; orion; saturnv; sls; spaceexploration; spacelaunchsystem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 07/08/2014 3:48:24 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat
$2.8 million?

That might be enough to buy the computers to design the logo of a "super-powerful rocket" for NASA.

2 posted on 07/08/2014 3:50:12 PM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

$2.8 million only?

The Government-Industrial complex can’t design a toilet for that sum. My guess is that cost only covers the cool graphics NASA will use to announce the project — for launch in 2045


3 posted on 07/08/2014 3:50:52 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Mmmmmm, strap on boosters, that’s sure to give Nanzi
pelousy a thrill.


4 posted on 07/08/2014 3:50:57 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

haha. EXACTLY! Someone got some figures wrong.


5 posted on 07/08/2014 3:51:22 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

$2.8 million is for the Muslim outreach before the contract.


6 posted on 07/08/2014 3:51:29 PM PDT by Obadiah (None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Scientists and engineers have criticized the agency for incorporating spare parts and outdated technology in their construction plans.

Why reinvent the wheel?

7 posted on 07/08/2014 3:52:05 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Err. The estimating department may need to cut back on the two martini lunches… just sayin


8 posted on 07/08/2014 3:56:45 PM PDT by DanielRedfoot (Creepy Ass Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If it were up to me I’d cut the social programs to a bare minimum and give half the savings to NASA. At least NASA has a record of getting by on what they get.

One stipulation, they have to ditch the climate change crap and become a pathfinding and prospecting organization.


9 posted on 07/08/2014 4:00:17 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The outdated technology was somehow able to get us to the moon and back five times. Eight, if you count Apollo 8, Apollo 10, and Apollo 13, although those three didn't land.

We have been using the Russian-designed RD-180 engine for lots of launches, and it's a very old design.

10 posted on 07/08/2014 4:01:11 PM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Why are you posting this a year after the story was written?


11 posted on 07/08/2014 4:02:36 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

not much cash considering what Obama is costing us


12 posted on 07/08/2014 4:15:22 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

guessing 2.8 billion.


13 posted on 07/08/2014 4:19:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
guessing 2.8 billion.

What's "off by a factor of 1000" to a reporter?

14 posted on 07/08/2014 4:21:02 PM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Ha! or the government for that matter


15 posted on 07/08/2014 4:26:52 PM PDT by DanielRedfoot (Creepy Ass Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

nobody pays attention to him unless he unloads outer space on us


16 posted on 07/08/2014 4:37:28 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

17 posted on 07/08/2014 4:40:32 PM PDT by gura (If Allah is so great, why does he need fat sexually confused fanboys to do his dirty work? -iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

I’m for it only if they guarantee it will fly at LUDICROUS speed, Lord Helmet.


18 posted on 07/08/2014 5:17:53 PM PDT by cashless (Obama told us he would side with Muslims if the political winds shifted in an ugly direction. Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

They might get the blueprints for that price. Maybe.


19 posted on 07/08/2014 5:20:22 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Nuclear propulsion would be great.


20 posted on 07/08/2014 5:23:48 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson