Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bob Schieffer: Romney may consider 2016 run if Jeb Bush doesn’t
Washington Post ^ | 4/27/2014 | Wesley Lowery

Posted on 07/08/2014 6:01:25 PM PDT by WilliamIII

Mitt Romney has said time and time again that he has no interest in running for president a third time.

But, on Sunday morning, CBS' Bob Schieffer said not to write off the idea of a 2016 campaign by Romney so quickly.

"I have a source that told me that if Jeb Bush decides not to run, that Mitt Romney may actually try it again," Schieffer said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; liberal; loser; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: WilliamIII

rino 2 will run if rino 1 doesn’t. yawn. kabuki makes me tired.


21 posted on 07/08/2014 6:08:45 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

22 posted on 07/08/2014 6:09:45 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

I think Bob Scheiffer is erect only because of Viagra.


23 posted on 07/08/2014 6:09:59 PM PDT by bakeneko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

LOL


24 posted on 07/08/2014 6:12:01 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Romney and Bush?

Dumb and dumber.


25 posted on 07/08/2014 6:12:20 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bakeneko

Either that or rigor mortis is setting in.


26 posted on 07/08/2014 6:12:50 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

The Reaganites were purged out of the party leadership by the GOPe over the past quarter century.


27 posted on 07/08/2014 6:13:13 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Mitt couldn’t even beat John McCain.


28 posted on 07/08/2014 6:16:17 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Romney could not defeat the worst president in the last seventy years. Why in H3LL would we want him back?


29 posted on 07/08/2014 6:18:51 PM PDT by lrdg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

What he said!


30 posted on 07/08/2014 6:19:22 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Where is Ronald Reagan?

Ted Cruz

31 posted on 07/08/2014 6:22:58 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

“Look, I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush,”

In time Romney became a supporter of democrats financially, a fund raiser, and a democrat voter.

“”Mitt Romney’s 1992 Democratic Primary vote for Paul Tsongas — a technocratic modernizer and reformer, but very much a Democrat — raised some Republican eyebrows last week.
What hasn’t been mentioned: Romney’s vote formally enrolled him in the Democratic Party.””

“”The speculation is that Romney had originally intended to challenge Ted Kennedy in the Democrat primary then decided to run as a Republican. This makes his 1994 campaign strategy much more understandable.

According to a Romney campaign spokesperson, Romney “switched back.” One doesn’t know how Romney managed to “switch back.” According to the town clerk, Romney became an Republican only on October 19, 1993. The implication is that Romney had either never voted between his registration as a independent in 1979 and 1992 (so his vote in 1992 automatically enrolled him as a Democrat) or that he was a regular Democrat voters in those earlier elections and changed to Republican to run for Senate.””


32 posted on 07/08/2014 6:26:02 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
I'd like to see BOTH Romeny and Jeb running... at the SAME time.

In nomination campaigns in the past, it's the GOPe being quite disciplined, offering up one combatant at a time against a spread like butter set of 3, 4, 6, whatever decent conservative GOPtp candidates. If the GOPe faltered, its candidate would bow out, while the replacement would step in.

Both Romeny and Jeb running simultaneously would water-down the GOPe vote.

Now, just need some discipline among the GOPtp candidates!

33 posted on 07/08/2014 6:27:14 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N
.


The GOPe would never allow both Jeb and Mitt to run against each other ...

Naw ... the GOPe wisely prefers to spend its cash secretly sponsoring "political dark-horse whores" like Little Rickey Santorum and Mike Huckabee to dilute and divide the REAL conservative vote ...

just like they recently did in South Carolina.


.
34 posted on 07/08/2014 6:38:00 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Jeb Bush or Mittens Romney?

(For anyone who does not get the reference, it was a really stupid bomb of a movie.)

35 posted on 07/08/2014 6:55:21 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Christie, Bush, and Romney are not viable candidates, unless we are looking for a close second place in an otherwise winnable election.


36 posted on 07/08/2014 6:57:30 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Neither one. Ever.


37 posted on 07/08/2014 7:03:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

They can run under the DemocRat party. The Detroit RepublicRats must be purged from the party. Fock them.


38 posted on 07/08/2014 7:23:14 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Hey Bob... pick a democrat... We can pick out own standard without your liberal elite help.


39 posted on 07/08/2014 7:24:25 PM PDT by GOPJ (Remember the oath is to "support and defend the Constitution" not the President.FRrfreedom4u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd
"Bob Schieffer is still alive?"

Yes, fifth-columnist Schieffer is still stealing oxygen.

40 posted on 07/08/2014 7:26:33 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson