Why are you trying to get Boogieman to argue sotto voce with D’Souza’s lawyers?
Boogieman is declaiming the Google part of the allegation due to his investigation of the situation. You are supporting the claim based on the evidence of D’Souza’s lawyers’ actions (which, BTW, is not in and of itself evidence).
You have presented no evidence of Google altering their search algorithms over the issue. You haven’t even summarized the evidence allegedly produced by D’Souza’s lawyers, at least as far as I have seen. Yet you tell Boogieman he has to counter vague, unspecified evidence in order to make his claim that the issue is junk.
Essentially, you are saying the fact that an allegation has been made is the same as showing how the allegation is true, or at least how it COULD be true. By that logic, our very own Buckhead shouldn’t have immediately debunked Dan Rather’s national guard memos about President Bush based on his own expertise and experience.
I’m genuinely confused by your choice of argument on this subject - you demand all evidence while presenting none.
Confused? Or not reading what I wrote?
He said the google claim is bogus
I said the lawyers put a case in, so people can think its bogus but it is not necessarily so
It’s in the court system now
I never said it was not bogus
So if you want to stick your nose into it, read every post
Then present it factually