Skip to comments.Obama Revealed in Guatemala Policy
Posted on 07/13/2014 3:29:01 AM PDT by mgist
Obama Revealed in Guatemala Policy If you were observing U.S. diplomacy in search of the curious and you had decided to eavesdrop at one of its remotest, least-visited quarters you would go to the Central American republic of Guatemala, where you would find something quite revealing about the nature of Barack Obama.
This is not an exercise for a slow day. Americas diplomacy in Guatemala is a devastating exposé of Obamas political character. Through U.S. actions in Guatemalafar more than in Benghazi, in the Ukraine, in the Middle East or elsewhereObama stands forth, undisguised, as a left-wing radical. If this stuff were happening in the U.S., or in other regions that get any kind of spotlight, people would be confused about it because Obamas gigantic spin-machine would be making them dizzy. But this stuff is happening in Guatemala, and Obama feels no need to apply the spin because no one from the United States is looking.
Well, almost no one.
In Guatemala, Obamas machinations are made clear by how the U.S. embassy is interfering with the countrys internal matters. And those interventions are occurring in a way that will likely cause you to miss them; because the embassys interventions are being done in Spanish only. Its statements are not announced or catalogued in English; and they go unmentioned in U.S. media.
Except in this one.
On April 22, the U.S. embassy in Guatemala issued a statement criticizing the Guatemalan bar association for sanctioning Judge Yassmin Barrios; the lawyers guild had seen fit to suspend her from the practice of law for one year. You would think that the embassy could stay out of a matter like this. But Judge Barrios is a favorite of the U.S.and even of the White Housebecause she served as the judge in the Ríos Montt genocide trial. Indeed, Barrios had been sanctioned for her actions during that case. But just before the sanctions, she had received the State Departments International Women of Courage Award of 2014 for her actions in the same caseand received the award, in Washington, from none other than First Lady Michelle Obama.
During the trial, in her haste to reach a guilty verdict against Ríos Montt, the judge had taken the highly questionable step of removing Ríos Montts lawyer and then ordering two other lawyers to represent him, without consulting the defendant, in violation of his constitutional rights. In its statement, the embassy denounced the bar association for interfering with what it called judicial independence; but the bar association had only been fulfilling its constitutional duty. It was actually the embassy interfering in the judicial process by throwing its weight around. And the embassys tactic apparently worked. Shortly thereafter, the assembly of presidents of the professional associations, in a highly unusual and challengeable manner, cancelled Barrioss suspension (though confirming her ethical violation).
Consistent with its politics, our embassy had earlier supported another assault on judicial independence. In July 2012, Judge Silvia de León of the capital district read into the court record her description of a judges meeting at which Attorney General Claudia Paz y Paz had made an unannounced appearance. The attorney generals very presence at the meeting was illegal. In a word, Paz y Paz had tried to browbeat the judges into doing things her way. De Leóns act in putting the event on record was obviously an expression of alarm. The attorney generals purpose had obviously been to compromise judicial independence, not uphold it.
U.S. Ambassador Arnold Chacon was made aware of Judge de Leóns story; it was the two authors of this article who shared it with him, along with other perpetrations by Paz y Paz. The ambassador showed no interest in what we told him. In public he could always be counted on to defend Paz y Paz, an official favored by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton herself. Earlier this year, just before leaving his post in Guatemala, Chacon made a video in Spanish, addressed to the people of Guatemala, in which he declared that it was a privilege for my government to count on a partner like Dr. Paz y Paz. Chacon himself was being promoted to the post of director general of the Foreign Service. His service might well be described by a couplet from Gilbert & Sullivan: I always voted at my partys call/and I never thought of thinking for myself at all.
The Ríos Montt genocide trial was the centerpiece of Obamas and Paz y Pazs political agenda in Guatemala. During the trial, the State Department issued a press release that all but called for Ríos Montts conviction. The Ríos Montt trial has been intensely, not to say entirely, political in nature. At rare times it has been touched by considerations of law or legality, but only by coincidence.
Power in Guatemala today is crudely and improbably divided between the two factions that have more weight than anyone else: the traditional ruling oligarchswho emerged from the countrys long conflict with their power intactand the Marxist ex-guerrillas. With the leftist operative Paz y Paz as attorney general, and radical activists like Yassmin Barrios in key judicial posts, charges were brought against Ríos Montt that would have been dismissed out-of-hand in a system with true rule of law.
The oligarchs consented for the case to move forward, so as not to disturb the ruling coalition. When the trial became unbearable for them, they had it reset almost to its beginning with an order from Guatemalas highest court. The Left impatiently ignored the order and pressed ahead for a conclusion which is when Judge Barrios illegally ordered the two lawyers to represent Ríos Montt. Very quickly thereafter, she obtained a guilty verdict and slapped the 86-year-old Ríos Montt with an 80-year sentencewhich was immediately set aside by another procedural ruling. So the trial has been delayed; but the genocide charge remains on the table, and the judicial process against Ríos Montt is now scheduled to resume early in 2015.
The essence of the case becomes clear when you apply the facts of history to the definition of genocide a simple exercise that few parties in the debate appear to have done. For example: to the seven Nobel Peace Prize laureates who argued publicly for a conviction, the so-called genocide was a scorched earth campaign aimed at wiping out support for leftist guerrillas during Guatemalas civil war.
The Nobel laureates are entirely misguided on this point. A campaign aimed at wiping out support for leftist guerrillas is an effort to destroy the guerrilla movement. That is not the same as genocide.
Here is what genocide, by definition, is: the systematic destruction of all or part of a racial, ethnic, religious or national group. While part may open a small window of debate, the facts do not substantially support the charge. During the armed conflict, all races, all ethnic, religious and national groups fought on different sides, or stayed neutral. Crimes were committed by all sides to the conflict. And those crimes were explicitly absolved in the amnesty that ended the fighting.
During the conflict, no genocide was observed or reported. The charge of genocide was imported after the fact by the international Left, and it was politically motivated. Since various exceptional crimes had been exempted from the amnesty, the charge of genocide became a giant stick that the Left could use to beat its opposition. And the Obama administration has provided open and vigorous support for this Leftist program.
The evidence of history does show that Ríos Montt is guilty of a serious crime; but it is not the crime of genocide. His crime is that he and his regime, during the armed conflict, contributed mightily to defeating the Marxist guerrillas. The Marxists, when they commenced their insurgency, assumed that the impoverished peasants would quickly side with their effort to overthrow the government. The peasants, in their wisdom, did largely the opposite; they turned to the army for help. The army trained and armed many peasants, organizing them into civilian defense patrols which finally handed the guerrillas a military defeat. These are facts that the international left, ever since, has been desperate to conceal and deny.
The Marxists signed the peace accords of 1996 so they could continue their quest for power by political means. Like all other signers, they were pledged to reconciliation, but unlike others they practiced their solidarity in one direction only. With Paz y Paz in the post of attorney general, the guerrillas gained an opportunity to persecute and destroy their old enemies in the army. This chance they exploited to maximum effect with the help of the Obama administration.
The Obama administration supports the ex-guerrillas because the two groups, in their essence, are the same. The tactic they mutually value is that of divide and conquer using race, gender and class warfare as tools. In Guatemala, the self-proclaimed human-rights groups former guerrillas who expertly co-opted the concept have a vested interest in keeping people poor and dependent. It is the lifeblood rationale in their struggle for power, and for foreign material and political support. The last things they want are development, progress and the rule of law. The oligarchs play along because they want to keep their economic advantages, which come largely from the privilege of being above the law. While these two groups co-govern with impunity, the rest of society suffers people of all races, ethnic groups, religions and social classes beneath the oligarch level.
In the U.S., Obama portrays himself as the selfless defender of the public good, while painting his opponents as selfishly motivated and, by implication, evil. Drawing on the human tendency to blame the other, Obama and his partisans sow fear and hatred against their enemies, giving themselves a two-for-one benefit: blame their failures on the enemy, and use that same failure to create a greater number of people dependent on government. Republicans, even under Obama, have a sufficient stake in the system a share of power, and substantial privileges to play along. While the rival parties co-govern with near-perfect impunity, most other Americans are adversely affected people of all races, ethnic groups, religions and social classes who are not part of the elites.
The Obama administrations blatant support for the ex-guerrillas of Guatemala shows the unvarnished Obama agenda. The U.S. embassy and its friends mercilessly oppose, with callous disregard for the facts, those Guatemalans who faithfully execute their duties, like Judge de León and the officials of the bar association people who really do support the rule of law, and thereby threaten the leftist agenda.
The Obama administration and the Guatemalan Left are cousins in the struggle to remake the world as they think it should be, completely convinced that they have a monopoly on truth. But true principles are their enemy. So is the rule of law. Principled actors would not behave as they do. People of principle understand that no one owns the truth, and that principled opposition must be welcome. In a system of laws and constitutional protections, that is the appropriate way to act.
Obama and his minions have obviously missed that part of the program. And now, in Guatemala, they are putting their twisted politics into play. With the administrations immunity from domestic scandal and the lack of U.S. journalistic interest in Guatemala, the U.S. president is working here, openly and ardently, on behalf of an undemocratic movement, completely free from concerns of exposure.
Hopefully, that is, until now.
The damage caused by the POTUS, and those his regime reports to, is beyond comprehension.
This is just a glimpse, but know that the US is surrounded and inundated with terrorist murderous drug cartels thanks to Obama.
WikiLeaks, Honduras and the U.S.,
Obama supported Chavez’ Candidate in Honduras. Released cables make it clear that the U.S. knew Manuel Zelaya was a threat to democracy in Honduras.
Obama Revealed in Guatemala Policy
Chavez used Venezuelan Military to turn Venezuela into the Biggest drug Distributor in the World 2013
How Venezuela’s Military Tried to Fly A Ton of Cocaine to France
State Department Reports Hezbollah Increasing Drug and Terrorism in South America 2013
“There has indeed been a marked resurgence of Iranian state sponsorship of terrorism over the past 18 months. But as the new Nisman report drives home, heres an even more disturbing fact Iran has run intelligence networks in the United States backyard to sponsor, foster and execute terrorist attacks for decades.”
“Criminal plans” by Iran could be under way in Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago, the report said.
Mexican Cartels Buying Afghan Heroin
And Obama is bringing in untold thousands of cartel members, MS13, and other gang members under the guise that they are minors to be resettled in the US. These are forces of crime and chaos that are being transported all over the US by HHS and DHS with our taxpayer dollars.
I thought the interference in Honduras was more overt; the supreme court ordered the military to remove the president (which they did), and Obama treated it as a right-wing coup, pressing them to restore him.
Lesson: When you overthrow a dictator, shoot him; then Obama can’t pressure you to restore him.
They are coming HERE because there is no Law,
thanks to the corrupt, TREASONOUS, and deservedly
HATED, and EXEMPT (as they deem) US Congress.
Guatamala is a deeply religious nation with leadership inspired by the Word of God and willing to fight to advance His Word.
When a nation, no matter how tiny and weak, is on the side of the Lord He will strengthen them beyond the power of their enemies.
When we in the US return to the Lord the power of satan will have no authority among us.
Honduras is as well; that is why they removed the Marxist president after his power grab.
Meanwhile, in our equally Treasonous Congress....
He and his minions are deliberatley destabilizing the US to the point where he has no other choice but marshal law and the elimination of the constitution and American law
“In the U.S., Obama portrays himself as the selfless defender of the public good, while painting his opponents as selfishly motivated and, by implication, evil. Drawing on the human tendency to blame the other, Obama and his partisans sow fear and hatred against their enemies, giving themselves a two-for-one benefit: blame their failures on the enemy, and use that same failure to create a greater number of people dependent on government. Republicans, even under Obama, have a sufficient stake in the system a share of power, and substantial privileges to play along. While the rival parties co-govern with near-perfect impunity, most other Americans are adversely affected people of all races, ethnic groups, religions and social classes who are not part of the elites.”
Sums it up nicely.
This story deserves a GREAT deal more attention and investigation.
The USA donates nearly $400 million in “foreign aid” to Guatemala every year.
“The damage caused by the POTUS, and those his regime reports to, is beyond comprehension.”
That’s a fact.
Obama has the mindset, vis-à-vis the American people, that “If God had not intended them to be shorn, He would not have made them sheep.”
Obama sees the American people as sheep, weak and passive, ready to be fleeced and shorn, and then discarded when they are no longer useful to his aims.
“... to the point where he has no other choice but marshal law and....”
You mean, as in Marshal Matt Dillon?
Please, please, please use the correct word. It is MARTIAL law.
We are currently living under Partial Law. Obama's decrees cover everything else.
LOL! You are right about that!
[ The peasants, in their wisdom, did largely the opposite; they turned to the army for help. The army trained and armed many peasants, organizing them into civilian defense patrols which finally handed the guerrillas a military defeat. These are facts that the international left, ever since, has been desperate to conceal and deny. ]
Seems the Socialist in Office [ Barry ] didn’t like the fact the Communists Rebels were defeated from a military lead ground roots campaigned that worked successfully - uhm...I wonder if he is worried about the same thing occurring here in the US????
PING - Central American Revolution
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.