Bundy ranch standoff highly coordinated, reflecting threat of larger far-right militia movement

SPLC ^ | 7-10-2014

[equalator]

“The Bundy ranch standoff wasn’t a spontaneous response to Cliven Bundy’s predicament but rather a well-organized, military-type action that reflects the potential for violence from a much larger and more dangerous movement,” said Mark Potok, senior fellow in the SPLC’s Intelligence Project. “This incident may have faded from public view, but if our government doesn’t pay attention, we will be caught off guard as much as the Bureau of Land Management was that day.”

[tanknetter]

Clive Bundy, unlike SPLC, didn’t incite an extremist nutcast to attempt political assassination/mass murder.

[stinkerpot65]

Oh, they are paying attention. They aren’t ordering billions of bullets each year for target practice. They have lists and plans, and those plans will be enacted sooner or later.

[servo1969]

The SPLC operates on the premiss that violence is wholly a product of the right.
If you are right wing you are prone to violence.
If you are prone to violence you are right wing.

Left wing = peaceful
Peaceful = left wing
Right wing = violent
Violent = right wing

That’s all there is to it.

The New Black Panther Party is as far to the ideological left as an organization can be but is considered a right wing organization by the SPLC. Why? Because they are prone to violence.

I - you not!