Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds spend $500,000 to study whether mother-daughter dancing can cure obesity
Cain TV.com ^ | July 14, 2014 | Herman Cain

Posted on 07/14/2014 5:12:15 PM PDT by Kaslin

And the worst part is: It's not the first time.

I told you on the radio Friday that the National Institutes for Health had spent nearly $500,000 on a study to see if getting mothers to dance with their daughters could help reduce obesity. I even offered to help the federal government out by recording a promo – for only 500 bucks, mind you! – saying, “Put down that pork chop and no one gets hurt! Back away from the banana pudding!”

That’s how you cure obesity!

But there is more to the story. This particular study, conducted with the aforementioned federal grant to the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, was aimed at African-American girls with the theory that those in the lower-income, urban setting might be more likely to retreat from physical activity, so maybe they would do more of it if their parents were involved.

Thus the idea of teaching mothers and daughters to engage in “Afro-Centric” dance together.

Hey, why not? It’s only a half a million dollars, right?

Wait. Here’s a reason why not. The federal government has tried this before, and they already know it doesn’t work! Fox News reports:

The government has spent $11,158,004 on similar projects examining dancing as an obesity prevention method for minority groups since 1999.

Dr. Tom Robinson, a professor of pediatrics at Stanford University, has led two multi-million dollar studies focused on African-American and Latina girls and the “innovative” way to get them to lose weight by dancing.

The first study was conducted between 1999 and 2006, at a total cost of $6,802,779.

For two years the project followed over 200 low-income African-American 8- to 10-year-old girls and their families who participated in after-school hip-hop, African, and step dance classes. Robinson conducted “in-home surveys” of the families, and measured their “height, weight, skinfold thicknesses, [and] waist and hip circumferences.”

The results of the study were not promising with regard to obesity.

“A culturally tailored after-school dance and screen time reduction intervention for low-income, preadolescent African American girls did not significantly reduce BMI gain compared with health education but did produce potentially clinically important reductions in lipid levels, hyperinsulinemia, and depressive symptoms,” results posted in the National Library of Medicine read.

So on the basis of $11 million the government has already spent, we already know that government programs to encourage young girls to dance do not reduce obesity. I could have told them that and saved them the $11 million, but whatever. Now we know. No reason to spend any more money on studies like this.

Except that we did go ahead and spend more money on a study like this. And we will probably do it again.

Now some of you will point out, and fairly enough, that this was not solely a Democrat boondoogle, as the original study was initiated during the Clinton Administration and proceeded through more than half the Bush Administration. It’s true. President Obama did not sit in the Oval Office and think up this idea (nor, I’m sure, did President Clinton or President Bush). But that is not the point. The point is that government has a maddening tendency to throw away money on nonsense like this. Professional bureaucrats are constantly looking for new excuses to fund the latest study or concept to try to solve your problems, because they are convinced you can’t solve them yourself.

And the reason this matters in a political sense is that the political class is convinced big government can come up with solutions to every problem that ever existed, provided the rich pay enough taxes and we continue to elect the party of big government to keep these big ideas rolling right along.

I’d just like to remind you that the government in which these people invest so much confidence is the one that spends millions to find out if you can cure obesity by getting girls to dance. And then, after finding out you cannot, spends more money on another study seeking the exact same information.

I think I’ll just stick with my original strategy: Put down the pork chop, and no one gets hurt!



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: governementspending; governmentwaste

1 posted on 07/14/2014 5:12:15 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What a sorry bunch of losers.


2 posted on 07/14/2014 5:14:44 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

3 posted on 07/14/2014 5:14:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Feds spend $500,000 to study whether mother-daughter dancing can cure obesity


Dancing sure can prevent obesity if mom and daughter spend their breakfasts, lunch and dinners dancing instead of stuffing their fat faces with chips and soda pop.


4 posted on 07/14/2014 5:15:18 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Its just a way of funneling money to favored groups - they fact they “dance” or do anything else is secondary.


5 posted on 07/14/2014 5:16:11 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Whoever authorized the funds being spent for this study should be fired or voted out of office!


6 posted on 07/14/2014 5:17:44 PM PDT by TruthWillWin (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That’s nothing. We sent $17 billion to Pakistan and in return they hid and defended Bin Laden.


7 posted on 07/14/2014 5:18:13 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hitlery: Incarnation of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That’s nothing. We sent $17 billion to Pakistan and in return they hid and defended Bin Laden.


8 posted on 07/14/2014 5:18:17 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hitlery: Incarnation of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn
Dancing sure can prevent obesity if mom and daughter spend their breakfasts, lunch and dinners dancing instead of stuffing their fat faces with chips and soda pop.

From the picture above, I would say skittles and grape soda.

9 posted on 07/14/2014 5:23:24 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

here’s a earth shattering idea...

STOP STUFFING FOOD IN YOUR MOUTH!

it is 100% impossible to gain weight if you stop over eating.

and it doesn’t cost a cent to eat less!


10 posted on 07/14/2014 5:32:35 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

facepalm on so, so many levels.


11 posted on 07/14/2014 5:33:19 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In other news, a son who has to take his mother to dances is a significant indicator of the son’s obesity.


12 posted on 07/14/2014 5:34:52 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You can get all kinds of mother-daughter action on the Web for far less than $500k.


13 posted on 07/14/2014 5:35:30 PM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All
With the exception of the federal entities indicated in the Constitution's Clauses 16 & 17 of Section 8 of Article I as examples, entities under the exclusive legislative control of Congress, the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for the purpose indicated in the title of this thread.

And while misguided federal Democrats and RINOs will argue that since the Constitution doesn't say that they cannot do something then they can do it, the Supreme Court has clarified the foolishness of that kind of thinking as follows. The Court has made it clear that powers not expressly delegated to the feds via the Constitution are prohibited to the feds.

”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

14 posted on 07/14/2014 5:43:44 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But Nancy Pelosi says the cupboard is bare and that there is no place else to cut. Brilliant woman that!


15 posted on 07/14/2014 5:44:02 PM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I am asking for $1 million to study college females who pole dance and its effect on test scores.


16 posted on 07/14/2014 5:44:14 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
That is a very important study. You might even get a job at one of the prestigious ivy league colleges to teach a course on that.

Who knows, it might even be a stepping stone to running for high office later on.

17 posted on 07/14/2014 5:55:08 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Herman Cain BUMP!

Regular listener to his radio program. This guy has his stuff together. Has lots of good ideas.


18 posted on 07/14/2014 6:16:33 PM PDT by upchuck (The country is being billed for its own execution. ~ h/t: SpaceBar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Is this even true.


19 posted on 07/14/2014 7:31:29 PM PDT by primrose (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson