1 posted on
07/17/2014 6:56:51 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Suggested title:
Incumbent protection act...
To: Kaslin
Would be nice if this could be taken by “conservative” naysayers to a Convention of States, who argue it would lead to removal of the second amendment.
In reality, the 2A is being eroded in every way OTHER than a new amendment by leftists... I have no problem with them TRYING to remove it by Constitutional means, but they don’t. With the former, they’d have no chance.
3 posted on
07/17/2014 7:01:41 AM PDT by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: Kaslin
Don’t like the Constitution?
LEAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 posted on
07/17/2014 7:02:54 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Kaslin
Markey is a creep.
Even worse than Lurch.
5 posted on
07/17/2014 7:07:03 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
To: Kaslin
Good luck getting it ratified.
But then the seventeenth amendment was never ratified, yet we still have the income tax.
7 posted on
07/17/2014 7:15:12 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: Kaslin
The Senate Judiciary Committee last week approved a resolution to amend the Constitution by empowering Congress to regulate the amount of money that could be raised or spent in federal election campaigns, and granting state governments the same authority in state elections. He who controls the money controls the outcome........................Kinda like 'Spice'....................
9 posted on
07/17/2014 7:23:35 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(I've posted a total of 2,763 threads and 85,286 replies. ...............)
To: Kaslin; Berlin_Freeper; GraceG; yldstrk; MeganC
are pushing a "People's Rights Amendment" WOW, that sounds outright Soviet.
Reminds me of the Volkskammer in East Germany.
10 posted on
07/17/2014 7:25:57 AM PDT by
KC_Lion
(Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
To: Kaslin
28.5 amendment Term Limits
11 posted on
07/17/2014 7:35:15 AM PDT by
molson209
(Blank)
To: Kaslin
Both XXIII and XXVI were ratified quickly, and both were extremely ill-considered.
14 posted on
07/17/2014 8:09:51 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. Hat)
To: Kaslin
Don’t like the Constitution or just parts of it? Then just enforce the parts you do like but only for the people you like. Or just twist the meaning until it suits you.
Not sure I see any need for amendments.
To: All
That's right! If you want to fundamentally change USA, you can! However, you cannot legally do it by legislating or judicial decreeing; you _must_ amend the US Constitution. Or else you are leading the country to war, against those who defend her from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson