Hey, I was right here on FR 11 years ago warning the alarm bells on that fiasco known as the Austrian Socialist. I knew he would be dreadful, only that he exceeded my expectations in execrableness. I said if McClintock wasn’t to be elected, better just to keep Off-White Davis, since Ah-nold would end up making Davis look like a Conservative.
That’s why I’m always warning folks that when you’re wanting to replace somebody with someone else, NEVER say the phrase, “ANYONE but...” because you’re likely to be in for a shock. There’s always someone worse than the incumbent, especially if you don’t know much about the challenger.
“That’s why I’m always warning folks that when you’re wanting to replace somebody with someone else, NEVER say the phrase, “ANYONE but...” because you’re likely to be in for a shock. There’s always someone worse than the incumbent, especially if you don’t know much about the challenger.”
So just what is it about Wolf that puts a burr under your saddle? That seems to be where you are with this issue. You know what you will get with Roberts. He doesn’t give a $hit about Kansas, other than kissing your butts right now so he can keep his seat. As you say, with Wolf, there is no demonstrable track record, but are there issues on which you disagree with his stated positions? And if so, what are the specifics?