Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, Halbig Did Not Gut Obamacare because of a Drafting Error
The Federalist ^ | July 23, 2014 | Sean Davis

Posted on 07/25/2014 12:05:25 AM PDT by SteveH

...

Let’s take a step back to see how plausible that explanation is. There are two types of exchanges: state-established, and federally established. The statutory authority for state-based exchanges comes in section 1311 of Obamacare. The statutory authority for a federal exchange in the event that a state chose not to establish one comes from section 1321(c) of Obamacare. Right off the bat, we have two discrete sections pertaining to two discrete types of health exchange. Was that a “drafting error”?

Then we have the specific construction of section 1321(c), which allows for the creation of a federal exchange. Nowhere does this section say that an exchange created under its authority will have the same treatment as a state-based exchange created under section 1311. At no point does it say that section 1321 plans are equivalent. Why, it’s almost as though the exchanges and the plans offered by them were not intended to receive the same treatment. Was that another “drafting error”?

...

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: halbig; obamacare

1 posted on 07/25/2014 12:05:26 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Executive order I. 1,2,3...

No problem. ..


2 posted on 07/25/2014 12:44:13 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

The American Legion Baseball Rulebook...has fifty-six pages. There’s only one guy who gets to edit and draft it...while there might be twenty guys in the discussion committee, and maybe another hundred regional guys who get a whack at changing certain rules. That’s the only way that you stay pure and clear on final version.

So, you start a new rulebook....2,300 pages. How many people controlling the final draft? Forty? A hundred? Two-hundred and forty?

How many people get a whack at changes on the 2,300 pages? At least a thousand? How many lobbyists are making inputs to one group but avoiding discussion with an entirely different group? How many Republican agents are part of the process and intent on writing corrupt standards into the 2,300 pages?

When you look over the 1936 Society Security Act...it was roughly sixty-six pages. One editor, and I’m guessing around two or three secretaries to type up changes as it progressed. It was under some form of control.

In this case....if the same idiots were writing the American Legion Baseball Rulebook....there’d be some listing requiring a player to squat over second base in the third ending...just for looks....before the opposing team could allow a batter to go up to the plate. The umpire would have wear a different color of shirt, depending on the day of the week. And rain-outs could only be called if seven spectators from the audience all agreed...but the seven could only be male, over the age of fifty, and be mentally alert when asked the question.


3 posted on 07/25/2014 12:50:28 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

The two types of rulebooks you describe also have two different objectives.

One is written to bring order, the other is written to bring chaos.


4 posted on 07/25/2014 3:27:38 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Smoking gun:

Watch Obamacare Architect Jonathan Gruber Admit in 2012 That Subsidies Were Limited to State-Run...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3184765/posts


5 posted on 07/25/2014 4:35:52 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

bttt


6 posted on 07/25/2014 5:30:20 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Exactly, they wrote it that way so the blue dog rats would vote for it.

It was no accident.


7 posted on 07/25/2014 5:32:09 AM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The original 1998 version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson