Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Repeal Prohibition, Again (New York Times: Let States Decide on Marijuana)
New York Times ^ | 07/26/2014 | NYT Editorial Board

Posted on 07/27/2014 5:18:10 PM PDT by Ken H

-snip-

There are no perfect answers to people’s legitimate concerns about marijuana use. But neither are there such answers about tobacco or alcohol, and we believe that on every level — health effects, the impact on society and law-and-order issues — the balance falls squarely on the side of national legalization. That will put decisions on whether to allow recreational or medicinal production and use where it belongs — at the state level.

We considered whether it would be best for Washington to hold back while the states continued experimenting with legalizing medicinal uses of marijuana, reducing penalties, or even simply legalizing all use. Nearly three-quarters of the states have done one of these.

Part 1: Let States Decide on Marijuana

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cannabis; marijuana; pot; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Ken H

Because Stoner Nation is just what we need in times of crisis. That would make our country so much better.


21 posted on 07/27/2014 6:18:30 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

“Repeal Prohibition, Again”

Again?

What amendment is he referring to? I am not aware of the amendment that gave this authority to FedZilla to begin with.


22 posted on 07/27/2014 6:33:00 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

Remember, if they’re stoned they’re not going to vote because that would be too much of a hassle.


23 posted on 07/27/2014 6:48:42 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Agreed.


24 posted on 07/27/2014 8:29:52 PM PDT by MarMema (Run Ted Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Liberaltarians never change


25 posted on 07/27/2014 8:32:09 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Not here in Washington. It was all about money and taxes from the people who were buying it anyway, and SAVING the money for courts and arrests as well.

Lots of conservative support here in our state...and the war on drugs is not working. What a waste of money.

I don't use it and never will, neither will my husband, but we both voted to legalize it.

26 posted on 07/27/2014 8:32:16 PM PDT by MarMema (Run Ted Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Calusa

and you can bet the NY Times totally supports that $23.6 billion ruling too.


27 posted on 07/27/2014 8:33:06 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Good idea, turn it over to the states to decide. And while they’re at it, turn the drinking age back to the states too. 21 is ridiculous, but that’s the age the Feds decided, not the states. Let the states decide without bribing them with highway funding, etc.

My suggestion: Age 19 or a high school diploma, whichever comes first.


28 posted on 07/27/2014 8:34:56 PM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

George Soros is one of the biggest proponents in marijuana legalization. He has hundreds of millions invested in it.


29 posted on 07/27/2014 11:13:54 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

“Remember, if they’re stoned they’re not going to vote because that would be too much of a hassle.”

Not if the RATS provide free munchies at the polling place.


30 posted on 07/28/2014 5:41:05 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Just a few years ago, there were strict laws on the books just for possession. What changed? Obama and the Left seizing power.

States were reducing possession to the equivalent of a speeding ticket, and survey responses in favor of legalization were growing, long before 0bama took office. The demon-marijuana meme just couldn't pass the tests of time, observation, and experience.

31 posted on 07/28/2014 6:13:40 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

Nope, getting up even for free munchies would be too much.


32 posted on 07/28/2014 6:58:31 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson