As I understand it, he offered to sell them a kind of cake that he does do. They want a kind of cake that he doesn’t do.
He hasn’t denied them service.
He’s denied them the power to change his menu.
Every time I read one of these cases I read that claim in comments but each one specifically says something like the following:
“”I didn't discriminate against anybody,” Phillips countered. “Like Nicolle (his attorney) said, I've chosen not to make cakes for same-sex weddings. I told David and Charlie when they came in that I would sell them cookies and brownies and birthday cakes and shower cakes. I just don't do the same-sex wedding cake.”
He clearly says he refused to bake them a wedding cake, it says nothing about him offering to bake them a wedding cake that that looks the same as would for normal couples, he says he offered them cookies instead of a wedding cake,.
I am still waiting for a case like that, matching the claims,
These sound like martyr cases. I want to see a real case,