[Jack Hammer]

“....if such rankings are used broadly, they could have a disparate and adverse impact on.. criminals.

And we wouldn’t want to hurt their feelings!

[Sherman Logan]

Here’s a true classic!

Treating offenders the same regardless of their “race” has now become “racial bias.”

[Bringbackthedraft]

20% longer sentences for young black men than for other offenders. ...................... More violent crimes, repeat offenders, is there a problem with that? They want to release criminals sooner?

[rightwingintelligentsia]

When Holder gets through with the (Social) Justice Department, there will be racial limits imposed for sentencing and imprisonment. White guys will get longer sentences than anyone else, just to be “fair.”

[upchuck]

I honestly think if Holder had his druthers, it would go like this:

Judge: Are you white?
Defendant: Yes
Judge: Are you middle class?
Defendant: Yes
Judge: Then off to prison with you!

Holder is tilting at windmills.

[RightOnTheBorder]

"Holder says if such rankings are used broadly, they could have a disparate and adverse impact on the poor, on socially disadvantaged offenders, and on minorities. people who committ crimes."

[reefdiver]

Why stop there Eric? Just oppose minority sentencing.

[winner3000]

Democrats are the party of science...unless science does not support their positions, which is most of the time! At that point they replace science with “fairness”, as defined by them, of course!

[relictele]

disparate and adverse impact on the poor, on socially disadvantaged offenders, and on minorities.

In other words, the very persons committing the crimes!

Law ENFORCEMENT? Not a bit of it.

Spare a thought for those poor rattlesnakes in Arizona. They don't get as much water as blue whales in the Arctic sea.