Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Wilson” (Movie Review-8/2/44)
Microfilm-New York Times archives, Monterey Public Library | 8/2/44 | Bosley Crowther

Posted on 08/02/2014 4:20:28 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson

1

 photo 0802-allies15_zps1af56e32.jpg

2

 photo 0802-allies16_zpsdcb6f10c.jpg

3

 photo 0802-allies17_zpse0f7ba68.jpg


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: history; moviereview; movies; realtime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Blennos
Correct:

"Though a critically acclaimed,[6] Oscar-winning film, Wilson is remembered for being a huge flop at the box office. It was a pet project of Darryl F. Zanuck, who greatly admired Woodrow Wilson, and its failure upset him to the point that for years he forbade his employees from mentioning the film in his presence.[5] The film is sometimes shown on cable television, and was first broadcast on Turner Classic Movies on February 8, 2013. Franklin D. Roosevelt showed the film at the September 1944 Second Quebec Conference with Winston S. Churchill. Churchill was unimpressed, however, leaving in the midst of the film to go to bed."

Source: Wikipedia

21 posted on 08/02/2014 8:56:20 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight
Yes, it did make a pitch for “one-world,” which was basically its function. It completely misrepresented the League of Nations Debate. The reality is that the irreconcilables won the debate by logically examining the underlying issues before the American public.

The initial public reaction to Wilson's proposal was overwhelmingly favorable (November, 1918). But by early 1920, it was clearly understood as an attack on American fundamental principles.

For a summation on what was involved in that debate, see League Of Nations.

"Wilson"--the movie--was heavily promoted, and was part of a campaign to steam-roller the UN through the Senate in 1945. The big lie, that those who stood up for traditional American values were benighted isolationists, continues to this day in Leftwing Academia & among their media parrots; but it was & is a lie.

William Flax

22 posted on 08/02/2014 8:58:14 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

That was shown on Movies tv network couple months ago


23 posted on 08/02/2014 3:52:27 PM PDT by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
That was a strong trend in Europe too. WWI shook Europe to its foundations and many thought a strong UN type organization could prevent another war. It's discussed quite a bit in the first volume of Churchill's history of WWII.

Thinking it would work after WWII is what was really crazy. The League was completely ineffective, as the UN has been. What is different is with the admission of all those Arab and third world countries it's just a sounding board for every Jew hater and anti-American tin pot dictator in the world.

24 posted on 08/06/2014 3:48:35 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

Not remotely interested in that segregationist’s bio. No wonder it was a flop.


25 posted on 08/06/2014 3:49:38 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson