Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Federal Judge Rules AR-15s Are “Dangerous and Unusual,” Not Protected by 2nd Amendment
Guns Save Lives ^
| August 12, 2014
| Dan Cannon
Posted on 08/12/2014 3:39:23 PM PDT by bamahead
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-304 next last
To: Fai Mao
So I guess the Constitution only applied to muskets And these.
81
posted on
08/12/2014 4:18:18 PM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Fai Mao
So I guess the Constitution only applied to muskets
And only if they are to be used for hunting./s
82
posted on
08/12/2014 4:18:22 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: OneWingedShark
Unusual:
Not unusual:
83
posted on
08/12/2014 4:19:10 PM PDT
by
vox_freedom
(America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
To: bamahead
“(as well as other magazine fed, semi-auto rifles with certain features),”
Wonder what features she had in mind?
To: bamahead
Graduated from Harvard Law and appointed by Clinton in 1995. Whaddaya expect. She’s had her 15 minutes of fame. It will be overturned by the SCOTUS.
85
posted on
08/12/2014 4:21:22 PM PDT
by
tom h
To: stephenjohnbanker
Guns are dangerous? And some are unusual?? Seems to me that that standard can be applied to judges and politicians.
86
posted on
08/12/2014 4:21:41 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Mastador1
87
posted on
08/12/2014 4:23:54 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens. KILL THE BILL!)
To: Born to Conserve
“...self-defense in the home, which is at the core of the Second Amendment right...”
Where did she read this piece illiterate Krap in the Constitiuton?
88
posted on
08/12/2014 4:25:01 PM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
((VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!))
To: bamahead
U.S. District Dishonorable Judge Catherine C. Blake (appointed by Traitorslickwillie) is a traitor to the United States of America. This judicial skank needs to be impeached and convicted, removed for the court, then indicted, tried convicted, and sentenced for giving aid and comfort to the enemy... and stealing oxygen.
But I don’t expect one single Republican politician to stand up and call its decision for what it is.
To: bamahead
Yeah, well allowing Commies like Holder to run Justice and liberal morons like Chuck Hagel to run Defense is also dangerous and unusual.
90
posted on
08/12/2014 4:25:06 PM PDT
by
tom h
To: bamahead
It seems like the country is pretty close to dead. Maybe it can be saved but I honestly doubt it.
91
posted on
08/12/2014 4:25:40 PM PDT
by
yarddog
(Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
To: bamahead
Crackpot, idiot, liberal judge.
An AR-15 must look mean to the dumba$$ twit, we should only own friendly looking rifles with a smiley face on the stock, I guess.
92
posted on
08/12/2014 4:28:13 PM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
To: bamahead
Judges are usually sworn to uphold the constitution. How did this enemy agent sneak in?
93
posted on
08/12/2014 4:28:43 PM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
To: OneWingedShark; bamahead
It’s ok, I have the “Hello Kitty” model!
94
posted on
08/12/2014 4:29:44 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
(Vertrou in God en die Mauser)
To: bamahead
Get ready for a smooth bore 50 cal.
95
posted on
08/12/2014 4:30:18 PM PDT
by
mylife
To: bamahead
Judge Catherine C. Blake. No mention of a spouse in any biography I can find.
96
posted on
08/12/2014 4:30:56 PM PDT
by
raybbr
(Obamacare needs a death panel.)
To: Born to Conserve
The often misunderstood US v. Miller backs up your contention.
That SCOTUS emphasized that weapons protected by the 2nd Amendment would be those that are commonly used by the military.
In that case they said sawed off shotguns fell outside said protection.
Nevertheless I agree that the purpose of the 2A is to give the people the ability to resist tyranny.
I have no idea where this case is headed in the appellate courts.
97
posted on
08/12/2014 4:30:56 PM PDT
by
Clump
( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
To: GeronL
Yes they do. This is utter BS!
98
posted on
08/12/2014 4:31:03 PM PDT
by
stevio
(God, guns, guts.)
To: bamahead
Tell those on the southern border that they don’t need a weapon to match the cartels and criminals.
Tell those in Nevada that they don’t need a weapon that matches those the authorities are wrongfully too willing to point at us average American citizens.
99
posted on
08/12/2014 4:33:33 PM PDT
by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: bamahead
100
posted on
08/12/2014 4:34:24 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-304 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson