Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutional Scholars: Sustained Airstrikes in Iraq May Be Unconstitutional
Townhall.com ^ | August 13, 2014 | Daniel Doherty

Posted on 08/13/2014 5:53:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Kaslin

No need to comment. That’s why the tag line says what it says.


21 posted on 08/13/2014 12:02:18 PM PDT by upchuck (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama is worried about doing something that’s against the constitution? That’s funny.

I haven’t heard one republican demanding he get congress’ approval.


22 posted on 08/13/2014 2:32:35 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

What is a Republican? What is a Congress?

Reading articles on this you would think they do not exist


23 posted on 08/13/2014 2:34:25 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The War Powers Act is not only unconstitutional, it is absurdly so.

First of all, the War Power of the United States is OUR power, delegated or granted to a Congress for a specific reason. It has NOTHING to do with the President, in fact, his designation as Commander-in Chief of the Army and the Navy only makes sense as the executor of powers located elsewhere.

Look at this: " the President is hereby authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on war against the Imperial Government of Japan…"

Authorized and directed. As it should be.

24 posted on 08/13/2014 2:40:17 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odds

“All I can say in this case is that Obama did the right thing. And, Congress should approve!”

No, no, no. Iraqi oil exported to the EU through Turkey will thwart Putin’s influence over the EU and delay his conquest of Ukraine and the Baltics. We can’t have that! Quick, we must alert the FSB Influence Agents to activate their conservative, anti-US government, isolationist assets to stop anti-imperialist aggression.

Quick, someone post the picture of John McCain with “ISIS spokesman Abu Masa” in Syria. We must make it clear this is all the fault of the US so the US has no moral authority to oppose ISIS or Russian conquests. We will tell them opposing ISIS or Russia is actually “helping Obama” improve his poll numbers. Is good.

/s


25 posted on 08/13/2014 3:06:08 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’d go with Bob Turner’s statement. He’s a longtime friend of mine, a two-career Vietnam veteran (soldier and diplomatic staff), one of the US’s top scholars on law and war, and perhaps the top scholar on Thomas Jefferson and the wrongful reporting that TJ fathered a child with a slave named Sally Hemmings (it was his brother, re DNA tests).

Our Vietnam Veterans for Factual History (VVFH.org) just held a press conference in DC last week in which we discussed some of these issues re the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the circumstances around it re going to war against No. Vietnam.

There is, as Bob says, a major difference between going to war against an established state as opposed to taking counter-terrorism actions against a genocidal bunch of maniacs who have also threatened to attack our country.

I would add the following: Continue to kill all the Islamic Jihadist bastards and let the buzzards and lawyers sort them out in the sand graveyards of Iraq.


26 posted on 08/13/2014 4:12:21 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

To #11> Good observation about “two authorizations to use military force that are still in effect”.

One of my son’s medals for service in Kuwait and Iraq is the “Global War on Terrorism” one. He’s very proud of having received it.

I believe that this “Global War on Terrorism” authorization is also still in effect.”


27 posted on 08/13/2014 4:17:48 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’d go with Bob Turner’s statement. He’s a longtime friend of mine, a two-career Vietnam veteran (soldier and diplomatic staff), one of the US’s top scholars on law and war, and perhaps the top scholar on Thomas Jefferson and the wrongful reporting that TJ fathered a child with a slave named Sally Hemmings (it was his brother, re DNA tests).

Our Vietnam Veterans for Factual History (VVFH.org) just held a press conference in DC last week in which we discussed some of these issues re the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the circumstances around it re going to war against No. Vietnam.

There is, as Bob says, a major difference between going to war against an established state as opposed to taking counter-terrorism actions against a genocidal bunch of maniacs who have also threatened to attack our country.

I would add the following: Continue to kill all the Islamic Jihadist bastards and let the buzzards and lawyers sort them out in the sand graveyards of Iraq.


28 posted on 08/13/2014 4:23:51 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m pretty sure that if he promises “days, not weeks” he has an eight month window for unlimited airstrikes.


29 posted on 08/13/2014 4:27:40 PM PDT by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

And I agree with you 100 percent


30 posted on 08/13/2014 4:35:31 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson