Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Can't Understand ISIS If You Don't Know the History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia
Huff Po ^ | Alastaire Cooke

Posted on 8/28/2014, 4:27:44 AM by TigerClaws

BEIRUT -- The dramatic arrival of Da'ish (ISIS) on the stage of Iraq has shocked many in the West. Many have been perplexed -- and horrified -- by its violence and its evident magnetism for Sunni youth. But more than this, they find Saudi Arabia's ambivalence in the face of this manifestation both troubling and inexplicable, wondering, "Don't the Saudis understand that ISIS threatens them, too?"

It appears -- even now -- that Saudi Arabia's ruling elite is divided. Some applaud that ISIS is fighting Iranian Shiite "fire" with Sunni "fire"; that a new Sunni state is taking shape at the very heart of what they regard as a historical Sunni patrimony; and they are drawn by Da'ish's strict Salafist ideology.

Other Saudis are more fearful, and recall the history of the revolt against Abd-al Aziz by the Wahhabist Ikhwan (Disclaimer: this Ikhwan has nothing to do with the Muslim Brotherhood Ikhwan -- please note, all further references hereafter are to the Wahhabist Ikhwan, and not to the Muslim Brotherhood Ikhwan), but which nearly imploded Wahhabism and the al-Saud in the late 1920s.

Many Saudis are deeply disturbed by the radical doctrines of Da'ish (ISIS) -- and are beginning to question some aspects of Saudi Arabia's direction and discourse.

(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Good information and historical context here from Cooke.
1 posted on 8/28/2014, 4:27:44 AM by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Irk-wan of the 20s and the roots of the Muslim Brotherhood did share some ancestry from what I read.


2 posted on 8/28/2014, 4:30:17 AM by KC Burke (Gowdy for Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Thanks.

Bookmark.


3 posted on 8/28/2014, 4:31:38 AM by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

In a way i can’t understand why even some wahabi saudis would support IS which follows a strict salafi doctrine. They’re all sunnis but salafis regard wahabis as ‘impure believers’.


4 posted on 8/28/2014, 4:38:46 AM by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Thank you for this, regardless of the source publication.

It took me a few minutes to read it, not being familiar with many of the names and ideas.

But well worth the time.


5 posted on 8/28/2014, 4:58:03 AM by steve86 ( Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I understand carpet bombing.


6 posted on 8/28/2014, 5:09:41 AM by Busko (One thing is certain, nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86

I usually post ‘barf’ or ‘lol’ threads from HuffPo. This one, however, was informative.

Traditional leftists see the threat from Islam. The ‘enemy of my enemy’ new left crowd doesn’t.


7 posted on 8/28/2014, 5:13:13 AM by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Yo. An enemy divided.


8 posted on 8/28/2014, 5:29:59 AM by 867V309 (Don't tread on me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
👍
9 posted on 8/28/2014, 6:22:49 AM by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a weapon...eh? "Bathhouse" 0'Mullah? d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odds
> ‘impure believers’

As far as I can tell, Muslims regard other Muslims as impure believers AT BEST.

And that's among their OWN brand of Islam.

Devotees of other brands of Islam are unbelievers fit only to be killed.

And we won't even mention what they think of non-Muslims.

Geez, what a bunch of lunatics. Lighten up, azzholes. (Not bloody likely...)

10 posted on 8/28/2014, 7:20:59 AM by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is...sounding pretty good about now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

You don’t need to understand ISIS, you only have to understand the tactical use of the M4.


11 posted on 8/28/2014, 8:13:55 AM by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

A well-aimed J-DAM which blows the Kaaba to smithereens will have strategic value, too.

If there’s nothing left for the muzzie arselifters to pray towards, then what?


12 posted on 8/28/2014, 12:05:25 PM by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

There’s not really that much you need to understand. All islamic sects are evil and violent and should be totally destroyed.

That concludes our lesson for today. Tomorrow we’ll cover the erotic mating habits of a tse-tse fly.


13 posted on 8/28/2014, 6:52:30 PM by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson