Posted on 09/06/2014 6:35:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
NFL culture has finally pissed the American left off. No, feminist Democrats are not irate about superstars beating their girlfriends into unconsciousness and equality activists are not protesting the NFLs lack of gender-neutral locker rooms.
Their ire is directed at the team name of the Washington franchise, the Redskins, and the left has its jockstrap all bunched up because owner Daniel Snyder is refusing to cower to their fad activism.
See, this whole feigned outrage is not about an offensive team name—its about control, its about liberal bullies not getting their way, and it is the epitome of fake courage.
Take ESPN commentator Tom Jackson. Upon learning that colleague Tony Dungy might not use the Redskin nickname on the air, Jackson boldly scratched a thin line in the sand and said he might follow Dungys lead and not use the term either. Apparently, Jackson cares so much for the Native American community that he may, or may not, choose to insult them all season.
The Washington Posteditorial board also jumped on the self-congratulatory bandwagon by announcing the slur would no longer be used by the publication. The board reminded readers of a concern it voiced back in 1992 when it stated the term was offensive. What the members of the editorial board failed to explain is why it took twenty-two years to finally take action on the strength on their conviction.
As Campus Reform reported, the University of Minnesota (U of M), whose TCF Bank Stadium is hosting the Minnesota Vikings for the next two seasons, revels in liberal hypocrisy as it tries to ban the Redskins name from being used in the stadium...while accepting $250,000 for hosting the game.
Is the revenue generated from the thousands of loyal Redskins fans flooding your arena worth compromising your deeply held convictions or not, U of M?
Liberals see themselves as crusaders for the weak when words are involved. Yet, when action is required, they scramble to the sidelines.
Professional activists and community organizers think they are fighting for Native Americans when they engage in this sort of trendy activism but they are oblivious to the real issues affecting the communities they claim to support.
Unemployment, crippling poverty, drug and alcohol abuse, and violence have devastated the 566 tribes recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. But Democrats and liberal (often paid) activists care about the name of a football team.
Why? Because elitist liberals think it should be changed and if you disagree then you are a bigot.
The anti-Redskin left are political geniuses but moral cowards. Since 1971, in typical controllist fashion, they have sent letters, protested Super Bowls, enlisted congress, all to force a private enterprise to conform to their demands. Their time would have been better spent finding ways to actually help the Native American community—but that is not as politically advantageous.
Progressives manufacture problems, use government power to shove change down throats, but when its time to be an active part of the uncomfortable solution, the left hides in the locker room showers.
So much for true courage.
These people are ALL losers. They have no life of their own and no self respect. They gain stature, in their own minds, only by joining with like losers in groups that protest or oppose some meaningless subject. It must be pure hell to be a liberal.
Change the name to the whiteskins, lets see if there’s a problem with that....
I like Snyder’s radio ads defending the name. One of them explains that a Blackhawk designed the logo.
Redskin Theater, Anadarko, Oklahoma — the heart of the Indian Nations.
” One of them explains that a Blackhawk designed the logo.”
now THATS Racess
How about the Washington Homosexuals?
The state's name is derived from the Choctaw words okla and humma, meaning "red people".
So, when do the PC Police begin banging the drums (little Indian ref there) for the state to change it's name?
Okay. What is the new Washington team nickname? The Washington Kickbacks? The Washington Scumbuckets? The Washington Lying Scum? The Washington Thieves? The Washington Pukes? The Washington Lying Stinking Puking Scummy Thieves? The Washington *#&@^^@$? All these names that reveal our wonderful government. Using the government as the way of choosing the new nickname. The Lying Scum sounds decent to me for the team to “honor” our beloved government pukes.
Washington Fags. Washington Homos. Washington *#&^%@%&.
So according to the liberal pc logic the name of Oklahoma is racist.
Better yet, & more apt — Blackskins, eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.