[dayglored]

Is it established that the attacker was male? The cited article doesn't indicate the gender of the attacker. Are there other sources that do?

Or is it just everyone's assumption (including mine) that if the attacker was a woman, that the victim would not make a complaint? The fact that it wasn't "rape" according to the book (no penetration) (see #8), means it could have been a woman in search of satisfying an urge.

So if the victim was a guy interested in maintaining his celibacy, it would be reason to complain.

Not that I doubt it was a gay assault; Occam's Razor says it was. Just sayin'...

[Behind Liberal Lines]

Is it established that the attacker was male? The cited article doesn't indicate the gender of the attacker. Are there other sources that do?

the full article (before the mod edited it) describes the attacker as a "Pale-skinned white male."