Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh: What if Holder’s resigning because Obama wants him on the Supreme Court?
Hot Air ^
| September 25, 2014
| Allahpundit
Posted on 09/25/2014 5:42:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Diana in Wisconsin
“Never underestimate the power of stupid people in
large groups.”
Someone should have told Hari Seldon. Maybe he could
could have predicted the mule.
Obama the Mule. Could he be a eunuch? He throws like one.
41
posted on
09/25/2014 6:33:26 PM PDT
by
Slambat
To: laplata
Yep, Mitt would have appointed Angela Davis or Bill Ayers. Or even Hitlery.All three of them are POSs. For rats, it appears that criminal behavior, is a prerequisite for employment.
42
posted on
09/25/2014 6:33:59 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(So we tanned his hide when he died Clyde and that's it hanging on the shed. Altogether now)
To: Slambat; Diana in Wisconsin
Perhaps he's doppleganging with 'Diana in Wisconsin' !
d:^)
43
posted on
09/25/2014 6:36:50 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: Mark17
For rats, it appears that criminal behavior, is a prerequisite for employment.
Yep, they run everything they touch just like the Mob operates. In fact, they make the Mob envious.
44
posted on
09/25/2014 6:37:46 PM PDT
by
laplata
(Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
To: laplata
To: tomkat
46
posted on
09/25/2014 6:44:07 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
_
47
posted on
09/25/2014 6:47:56 PM PDT
by
4Liberty
(Prejudice and generalizations. That's how Collectivists roll......)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Just funnin' ya .. and btw, I first saw it long ago, but your 'my garden kicks ass' still cracks me up !
48
posted on
09/25/2014 6:51:56 PM PDT
by
tomkat
(:^)
To: dalebert
I would be very careful ...remember they offed Joan Rivers for calling Michelle a tranny To the left, nothing is more offensive than......the truth
49
posted on
09/25/2014 6:52:16 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
No way ,not even with 100 Dem Senators
50
posted on
09/25/2014 7:15:15 PM PDT
by
molson209
(Blank)
To: Pearls Before Swine
No nuclear option for Supreme Court nominees... yet. And, it that were rammed through, along with Justice Holder, during a lame duck session, all hell would break loose.An understatement!
If Holder is involved, I can imagine 100,000 citizens with pitchforks surrounding the Supreme Court building --- indefinitely.
Then we can see if all the military officers who were asked (by Obama) if they "would shoot at American citizens..." or be dismissed, actually meant it.
To: Labyrinthos
Pay closer attention, Lab. Rush said “...it would be much easier for Eric Holder to make the jump from private sector law firm rainmaker after six years at DOJ to the Supreme Court, than from DOJ straight to the Supreme Court.” He clearly DID NOT say it was a requirement to resign from DOJ to be eligible for SCOTUS. Where did you get that idea?
To: Ben Mugged
I personally think Holders retiring to give Obama time to pardon him for any charges brought against him before Obama leaves office.Ha ha ha!
Too bad for them!
He can't be pardoned unless he's been convicted.
And I'm sure the statute of limitations for the many crimes that a*****e has committed under color of authority, runs longer than two years.
And they WILL be prosecuted...
...one at a time!
Good luck with that, morons.
To: ProtectOurFreedom
That makes even less sense. Think about it.
To: CharleysPride
You said :None but I beat him on TV!
I said look at not listen to
So Rush averages 2,500.000 listeners a show , if you have more views on your show you must be Bill OReilly or maybe spungbob square pants.
Which is it.
I assume you signed a bigger deal than Rush's 400.000,000 deal also.
55
posted on
09/25/2014 7:39:00 PM PDT
by
crosslink
(Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
To: publius911
In 1866, the Supreme Court ruled in Ex parte Garland that the pardon power “extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
56
posted on
09/25/2014 7:48:22 PM PDT
by
Ben Mugged
(The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
You will be sued by Ferguson, MO and the special DOJ prosecutors for that raciss post!
Shame!
To: Ben Mugged
In 1866, the Supreme Court ruled in Ex parte Garland that the pardon power extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.Thank you for that reply!
I am not a lawyer, nor even stayed at the Holiday Inn last night.
Now I have something to look up and read; perhaps even get input from other legal types for the legal morass since 1866.
Say... did Thomas B. Reed have any part in that adventure?
Did Abraham what'shisname play a role in the case going to the Supreme Court?
Ex Parte Garland- 1866
Yes, I actually plan to read it all...
To: laplata
Yep, they run everything they touch just like the Mob operates. In fact, they make the Mob envious.LOL, of course the Mob is envious. The government gets away with criminal activity all the time. The Mob only gets away with criminal activity some of the time.
59
posted on
09/26/2014 12:53:04 AM PDT
by
Mark17
(So we tanned his hide when he died Clyde and that's it hanging on the shed. Altogether now)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
be one bruising conformation hearing.
60
posted on
09/26/2014 3:01:50 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(Obammy lied and lied and lied.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson