[House Atreides]

“Lets not fight fellas! Lets find out who this goon is and confront him directly. ...”
************************************************************************************
The judge is female, but every bit the ACTIVIST judge who is KNOWINGLY rendering a decision which goes against very recent Supreme Court decisions saying Voter ID requirements are NOT unconstitutional.

[Milton Miteybad]

Which is why Texas and Wisconsin would be well within their rights, I would think, to enforce the voter ID laws as written, under the reasoning that said laws were held to be constitutional by a higher court. They could further assert that they viewed the most recent lower court decision to have been made by a "judge" who was ignorant of the ruling in the Supreme Court case.

By the time this lackwit judge gets it all sorted out, the election will be over, the votes counted and the matter will be resolved.

Picking and choosing which laws ( whether statutory, case or administrative) isn't just for Presidents, you know. The right to choose which laws we will obey and which we will ignore is for everybody in this great country. ;-)