“Lose the nosering and she’s not guilty.”
If she doesn’t lose the nose ring, what is she guilty of???
I would agree with you to a certain degree that tattoos are being a little overdone these days, and therefore it could be said that that is defacing, but I see no tattoos on her...
I might have missed it, did she say she had tattoos??? I dunno...
Oh, I thought you might’ve been up on our male FReeper game. Where we judge the “guilt” or “innocence” of the female persuasion based on their most superficial characteristics. As an example, when there is a thread on a female teacher doing something inappropriate with an underage student, we check to see if she is pretty and vote “not guilty” or if she is someone with trollish features who will put the young man in analysis for perpetuity and gets a “guilty” vote.
I was merely saying with the hideous nosering, she is “guilty” (hence undesirable), but when the nosering comes out, she is “not guilty” (hence attractive). That’s all. And no, no mention of a tattoo (which almost always earns a “guilty” from me).