Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne
"excuse my language, but how in the **** are the hospital personnel contracting this while supposedly in protective gear but Duncan’s family is not infected while interacting unprotected with his bodily fluids????"

The answer to this critical question is shown below. The woman in the protective gear is/was wearing the CDC's recommendation for protective gear.

Think of the VA and its problems when you think about the CDC. Both are controlled and staffed by liberals, who really aren't that concerned with doing their job properly. They are concerned about increasing their budgets and span of control instead of good results.

Thanks to Black Agnes for posting the link to this picture.

However the birthplace of pcism, Great Britain had even worse recommendations re haz mat garb for the UK’s medical workers.


11 posted on 10/15/2014 10:17:29 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (I, Barrack E Obolabama support the left wing's war on Ebola. Fox News & Republicans will fight me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave

Look at That!! So vomit/saliva/urine/blood or feces spray is dangerous in the eyes but OK on the hair or neck?


30 posted on 10/15/2014 10:24:40 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave

That is what I want to know. I cannot find a thing about Ducans family. Even DM has nothing. Just crickets....


37 posted on 10/15/2014 10:27:20 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
"excuse my language, but how in the **** are the hospital personnel contracting this while supposedly in protective gear but Duncan’s family is not infected while interacting unprotected with his bodily fluids????"

The answer to this critical question is shown below. The woman in the protective gear is/was wearing the CDC's recommendation for protective gear.

Unless your response is pure sarcasm (and I'm a bit sleep-deprived, so forgive me if I missed it), I don't get how having NO protection is somehow better than having some (albeit very, very imperfect) protection.

63 posted on 10/15/2014 12:09:21 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson