Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart

I suspect that it might be legally questionable to quarantine someone who has tested negative, thereby prohibiting him or her from traveling to another state.

As long as this kind of travel takes place on non-public transport, I am okay with this policy.

Of course, the first time that someone like this becomes infected after transport, there will be new demands for quarantines in that person’s home state.

It is probably reasonable to assume that many states will follow NY and NJ’s lead. And THAT is why Obama is so concerned about their policies.


45 posted on 10/27/2014 8:51:29 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: independentmind

Considering what ebola actually is and the 21 day incubation period, It is a national security issue. Her rights do not trump those of 300,000,000 other peoples right to remain alive.


47 posted on 10/27/2014 8:55:10 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart ("Refusing to vote against unprincipled people made Obama President. " - agere_contra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: independentmind
I suspect that it might be legally questionable to quarantine someone who has tested negative, thereby prohibiting him or her from traveling to another state.

I suspect that depends upon the statute. There is precedent for instituting quarantine upon the basis of contact.

48 posted on 10/27/2014 8:55:29 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Take the chip and watch them hack your brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson