Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

Besides not ‘liking’ EbolaObama or their reality of Obama Economics, the younger generation has nothing in common with the Geriatric Hate America leaders of the rat party.

The Clintoons, the icons/heroes of the aging Rat party, like so many of the elite rat power insiders are ancient in age and in their political core of hating America to get votes.

There are the other geriatric leaders of the rat party: Reid, Pelosi, Boxer, Fineswine, Madam Secretary Kerry, Bidden, Jessie Jack$on/Al $harpton and others. They started their power trips in the 1960/70’s with a core of Hate America, anti business and supposedly concerned about pseudo racism. They have blamed America for the problems created by them and their allies here and around the world for decades.

Decades, later, they haven’t changed and still push their out of date anti America core beliefs to buy and pay for their feral voters. Their biggest failure, the War on Poverty, is in their minds, their biggest success.

They have left only false hope and no chance for change for the younger voters of America. Mean while they have looted the treasury and made their families and friends super wealthy elitist chrony capitalists. This leaves nothing but massive debts for our younger Americans.

Their so called younger stars are pro abortion Barbies and gay Kens with even harsher anti America values merged with phony anti racist bs backed by Eric Holder. As a result, their younger wannabees struck out as bad during this past election as their passe older generation.

So the current ancient rats and strike out newbees have nothing to offer younger Americans.


8 posted on 11/10/2014 7:16:34 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Islam/ISIS = The Ebola of religious/political ideologies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave

Decades, later, they haven’t changed and still push their out of date anti America core beliefs to buy and pay for their feral voters. Their biggest failure, the War on Poverty, is in their minds, their biggest success.


I wish that the GOP would go after the Democrats on the War ON Poverty.

We fought a War on Poverty, and poverty won.

Why are liberals not held to account for the failures of their policies? Why do we never talk about how costly the war on poverty was, and continues to be to this day, and compare costs vs. results of our efforts to fight poverty???

How much has poverty been reduced since 1964?

How much have we spent on anti-poverty programs since 1964?

How many people have “graduated” from poverty as a result of the war on poverty programs?

How much has the cost of anti-poverty programs added to the trillions of our national debt today?

How many beneficiaries of anti-poverty programs become productive members of society, and grow up and are not themselves on public assistance????

Considering that such a big amount of federal spending goes to various “human services” programs, we never seem to discuss the results of that spending, whether we are spending money wisely in that area, whether we are getting results.


15 posted on 11/10/2014 7:26:23 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave

The Democrats who run America are too old, too rich, and too white.


25 posted on 11/10/2014 7:40:28 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson