It wasn't the exposure of cynicism, but rather hypocrisy. I am grateful to God that few people know of mine; be grateful to God if few people know of yours.
A virtuous message?
Cosby is and always has been a race-baiting Obama lover. He called Republicans racists for not standing at a SOTU speech, and said they were no better than segregationists.
He has praised Muslims as admirable and deserving of respect, and said we should all try to be more like them.
His “message” can go rot.
Any white man who was accused of what Bill Cosby has been would be in jail already. That’s the message.
I think Crosby’s commentary on black youth has more to do with marketing than anything else.
People 25 and younger aren’t his audience. People 55 and older are his audience.
Which group is more likely to respond favorably to his observations?
// irresponsible black baby daddies who abandon their children. //
Yet he fed one child to the tabloids to get an article on his rapes spiked and he abandoned another possible one (he admitted the affair). He is beyond hypocritical.
And this fluff piece, author is reading a message into Cosby that isn’t there. He is about empowerment, and rape is about power, the fact almost all of the women (21 by last count) were either white or bi-racial just screams a race element. The reason the media are not covering this angle is because the party line is blacks aren’t racist - even when they are.
So far, what we have in the Bill Cosby matter is allegations — a LOT of allegations, but merely allegations.
My journalism training tells me that when a lot of people independent of each other tell you essentially the same story, there is most likely something there. However, none of them has produced corroboration other than their own word.
Now, the same question arises as with the Herman Cain allegations: Where were these women years ago when all this is supposed to have happened? Why didn’t they speak out or speak to the media then?
Why is this coming out now? Is it possible that this is related to Cosby speaking out about the black culture, urging black families to stay together, urging black students to achieve, and the like? These things, if they were to happen, would be a threat to the “progressive” establishment that needs a permanent and expanding underclass to carry out its schemes. And Bill Cosby carried enough weight in the black community to be listened to. So they have an obvious motive for wanting to destroy Cosby.
Remember how The Party of Compassion and Tolerance used to attack Cosby’s TV show precisely because it presented a successful, intact black family. They can’t have that — it might show black folks the way out of the underclass, and the “progressives” need a permanent, ever-growing underclass.
Remember what they did to Clarence Thomas and to Herman Cain. There is a reason why black men who depart from any portion of liberal orthodoxy (in Cosby’s case, the promotion of broken families, non-education, and helplessness) are trashed this particular way. There is a pattern here, and it’s shameful and borders on racism.
The liberals thought "Gee, golly! We finally have a Negro who behaves like a white person! Let's idolize him!"
Now that the white liberals caught Jungle Fever, Cosby knew he could rape as many white women as possible. The white liberals would "have is back" because he was acting white.
Too late.
I never want to see his “ugwy” face or hear his voice again.
He earned our trust, our laughter, and now our scorn.
Like Martin Luther King, who has been said to have been a womanizing commie sympathizer, yet his content of character message is still valid.
Even if he only did it once.
Lol
What a hoot....I want what Miss Fields has in her bong pipe
Kosby kush bro!