Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept: U.S. Nukes Down 85%, From 31,255 to 4,804
The Weekly Standard ^ | December 19, 2014 | JERYL BIER

Posted on 12/19/2014 8:18:55 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

'We Still Have More Work To Do''

The State Department's Rose Gottemoeller, under secretary for arms control and international security, spoke at the Brookings Institution Thursday where she reaffirmed the United States' "unassailable" commitment to putting the nuclear weapons genie back in the bottle. Gottemoeller told the attendees at the Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Initiative-sponsored event that "the U.S. commitment to achieving the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons is unassailable."

She went on to note that the nation's stockpile of active weapons is down 85 percent from maximum cold war levels, falling to 4,804 in 2013 from a high of 31,255. But, she said, "We still have more work to do."

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Cuba; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cuba; disarmament; iran; military; nuclear; nukes; porthuronstatement; rosegottemoeller; russia; sds; surrender; venezuela; waronterror; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

You can’t hug a commie with nuclear arms.


61 posted on 12/19/2014 10:32:27 AM PST by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: W.

“-—why are they allowed to remain-—? “ Well one reason is that I’m only one guy and my legs aren’t long enough to track them all down one at a time. But I do let the local froot loops know when they’re pushing their luck. Semper Fi.


62 posted on 12/19/2014 10:32:47 AM PST by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Okay, sounds like you know something about this. That’s why I asked. So should I be sleepless since we only have some 1000 warheads on our Tridents? And how many Tridents are at sea at any given time? Think I’m going to go get a drink. Seems I was entirely wrong about our nuke defenses.


63 posted on 12/19/2014 10:33:46 AM PST by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

I think our 450 MMIII have one warhead from the MX missile - reduced to one, now.

I’m guessing the rest must be something of the B-83 type for B-2’s and standoff missiles for B-52’s.

I was thinking they dismantled all the B-61’s. Or at least they were.


64 posted on 12/19/2014 10:54:19 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

i live around 15 miles from the Boston city limits, will I be safe?


65 posted on 12/19/2014 11:34:51 AM PST by mowowie (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The State department is rotten with America haters and representatives that have “gone native” in their dealings with foreign powers.


66 posted on 12/19/2014 11:58:16 AM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
So what's your conclusion about our Tridents and Minute Men missle warheads? Think we have enough MAD to deter Russia or China? I do.

As I've stated many times they are not my worry. It's the Islamists once they get a nuke they can deploy or transport.

67 posted on 12/19/2014 12:09:31 PM PST by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

I think we’ve decreased our amount of nuclear weapons because we now don’t need as many as we did before. Their payload is greater and our targeting systems better.

I’m not really worried about a nuclear attack as much as I’m worried about some “inner city kid” killing me with a punch to the face as I walk down the street.


68 posted on 12/19/2014 12:12:38 PM PST by ReganDude (Give me liberty or give me death!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

I’d say we’re getting a bit weaker than I’d like.

As I think you’ve referenced, MAD works on everyone - except jihad-boys.

With O in office, I would expect they’d make moves elsewhere, at first.


69 posted on 12/19/2014 12:12:49 PM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: W.
And, why is it they are allowed to remain in positions of power once their intentions are exposed by their actions, instead of instantly removed and...?

Exactly the same question McCarthy asked, and we all know what happened to him.

70 posted on 12/19/2014 12:20:37 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
because they cannot differentiate between good and evil.

Sure they can, they are just confused about which is which.

71 posted on 12/19/2014 12:23:05 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Wait 'til he sells all of our nuclear secrets.

Will anyone stop him?

His final act as president will be the pardoning of every 'political prisoner' in America. It would number in the thousands.

72 posted on 12/19/2014 12:23:33 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
so the same might be true about nukes as well.

More likely they are lying and we only have a couple hundred.

73 posted on 12/19/2014 12:25:34 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Don’t forget Ethel and Julius,

But, but, but they were innocent, my professor said so.

74 posted on 12/19/2014 12:33:31 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
Chinese sub pops up in the midst of a US carrier battle group

Remember this?

75 posted on 12/19/2014 12:36:17 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

And now, most agree McCarthy was right all along. Pray it doesn’t take fifty years for the scales to fall...again.


76 posted on 12/19/2014 1:09:54 PM PST by W. (If government could truly create jobs communism would have worked the first time it was implemented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

Yep, 4800 is enough to destroy every major city on Earth multiple times over. Not a big deal. 30k is a little excessive and that means less maintenance. As long as we have around 4000, I think that number is perfect. When in a nuclear war will one country need to launch 30,000? When would we ever need to use 30,000 nukes? Enlighten me here.


77 posted on 12/19/2014 2:17:17 PM PST by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

This sums up conventional warfare perfectly. As long as you aren’t faced with destruction and only one nuke is being used during a war. You can escalate and launch more nukes. Causing the enemy to escalate, and launch more. Or you can respond conventionally with a massive blow like you hypothetically present.

The only time nuclear warheads are needed are for deterrence. There is no conventional reason beyond deterrence for needing 4800. IMHO. You will never use them beyond one or two scenarios, and you better hope to God the enemy doesn’t use a bunch of theirs and you have to respond in kind, because in that scenario, everybody loses.


78 posted on 12/19/2014 2:45:10 PM PST by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Isn’t that what I said? ;^)


79 posted on 12/19/2014 2:52:23 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Very comforting.


80 posted on 12/19/2014 2:55:03 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson