Posted on 12/23/2014 12:01:57 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Good news. I wonder what changed their minds.
The plan is to release the film simultaneously in participating theaters and via video on demand. The Plaza theater in Atlanta and a theater in Austin have now said they will distribute the film…
A plan to distribute “The Interview” over Dish Network fell apart after talks between Sony and the satellite TV provider broke down over the weekend.
The exact list of distributors was not immediately available, but the Art House Convergence, a national coalition of smaller, independent movie theaters, on Monday told Sony Pictures that its members are also willing and anxious to screen “The Interview.”
The likeliest explanation is damage control. They’ve gotten tons of bad press for pulling the movie, even though they pulled it only after every major national theater chain pulled it first. But … they’ve also gotten tons of bad press from the e-mails released by the hackers, with promises of more embarrassing leaks to come if Sony made “The Interview” available to the public. Remember, the hackers reportedly lifted 100 terabytes of data from the company, a fantastically huge amount and only a tiny bit of which has been published so far. If Sony had embargoed “The Interview” permanently, it would have been off the media’s radar by New Year’s. As it is, they’re risking new leaks far into the future for doing this.
So “damage control” doesn’t really cut it. Maybe this became a matter of principle for them. Between Obama urging them publicly to release the film, Clooney trying to drum up outrage in Hollywood, and their own understandable umbrage at being under a bunch of hackers’ thumbs, they might have decided that the only dignified move left was to extend a middle finger of freedom and put the film out. It’s empowering to defy an extorter, even if the consequences are likely to be grim. And it could be that the good PR they’ll get from doing this will make the media less willing to abet the hackers from now on by breathlessly publishing whatever new material leaks.
Another possibility is that that the feds have gained some sort of advantage against the hackers that we don’t yet know about. If they’ve identified the people responsible and arrests are imminent (or, say, if China has quietly issued an ultimatum to Kim to knock this off ASAP), Sony might know. Releasing the film after arrests are made and it’s “safe” to support free speech again would look weak. Releasing it now, when they’re still at risk, is daring. And it’s good business. The movie looks terrible; the minute it loses its value as a free-speech cause celebre, it loses 95 percent of the reason to see it. Might as well cash in while public curiosity is high, knowing that the crash is coming.
Unrelated exit question for First Amendment lawyers since I’m too lazy to write a separate post: Since we’re on the topic of free speech, does Massachusetts have a shot at getting a conviction against this guy that’ll stick?
A Chicopee man who officials say made a threatening comment towards police on a social media page will be charged.
Police say Charles Dirosa wrote, “Put Wings On Pigs” on his Facebook page Monday…
“After the events of the past few days, the PD took this threat very seriously,” Chicopee police officials wrote on the department’s Facebook page.
My understanding of the law on threats is that courts typically give defendants a wide berth when what they’re saying could be interpreted as an especially hyperbolic form of political speech. The famous example is the Vietnam War protester who told a rally in the mid-60s that if the army drafted him, the first person he’d have in his sights is LBJ. That conviction was overturned. Arguably, “put wings on pigs” is the same sort of incendiary exaggeration but applied to the police. Problem is, the degenerate who shot the two cops in New York said something similar on social media and he obviously wasn’t exaggerating. Does his act move another man’s threat out of the realm of exaggeration into “credible threat” territory? And does the objective/subjective standard matter here? I don’t think so, just because it seems clear that “Put Wings on Pigs” is supposed to make cops afraid. It’s not an ambiguous statement that people might interpret one way as a threat and another way as something completely innocuous.
Update: The man at the eye of the storm rejoices.
The people have spoken! Freedom has prevailed! Sony didn't give up! The Interview will be shown at theaters willing to play it on Xmas day!
— Seth Rogen (@Sethrogen) December 23, 2014
I couldn’t care less
If Team America isn’t in it, not worth seeing!
I’m smelling a PR stunt
As a friend’s wife would say:
“that’s nice.”
It was all a marketing ploy to push a mediocre film.
A Chicopee man who officials say made a threatening comment towards police on a social media page will be charged.
Police say Charles Dirosa wrote, “Put Wings On Pigs” on his Facebook page Monday…
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
What will he be charged with?
Even a-holes have freedom of speech.
Could this have been a really elaborate publicity campaign for a movie?
On CNN alone they’ve played the same 10 second clip hundreds of times already.
You do know they have “evolved sensibilities” up there in Massachusetts, don’t you?
Bass Turds.
Find out who their AD folks are and we can burn it to the ground.
Same here. In fact, if it turns out that this is so, I called it 2 days ago on Facebook. And I’ll be reminding people.
I’ll see it when it comes on the classic movie channel. Or not.
I’m going to see “American Sniper” on Christmas Day.
“As it is, they’re risking new leaks far into the future for doing this.”
Really, Sony is better off acting as if everything will be leaked anyway. Once you give in to a blackmailer, then they know they have you on the hook and will keep asking for more and more.
What a triumph for pornographic filth.
Merry Xmas!
Let’s see, they were going to be distributed in every major theater chain in the country. Now they are down to a few art house theaters and independents, and possibly some early on demand release (basically straight to video).
A PR stunt would be designed to increase profits, not decrease them.
more brainless crap from Hollywood , not even vaguely worth the money spent to see it .
Why don’t they make an accurate documentary about the ravages , viciousness , and insanity of the entire Kim lineage?
The complete details , as much as we know . Now THAT would be a movie worth making and releasing, worth seeing and worth defending. Not this comedy crud that makes light of such a heinous , Hitlerian situation .
Totally a PR stunt. Bet it makes a ton now, too bad we can’t know the answer to “what if.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.