Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana; GOPJ; Jane Long; SgtBob; Grampa Dave; justiceseeker93; notted; no-to-illegals; ...
OBAMA CALCULATEDLY SKIRTED THE LAW AND SIGNED TWO "MEMOS" TO LAUNCH AMNESTY: Nullification means power to the states and power to the people.

ACTION NOW: Write your governor; call your state attorney general.

The judiciary has consistently ruled against the nullification doctrine, asserting its unique, judicial right to declare laws unconstitutional.

But this executive order isn’t a law. And given its extremely shaky legal footing, it isn’t difficult to imagine a federal bench recognizing the states’ right to disregard federal orders that don’t clearly have the force of law.

And that would be a tremendous — tremendous — blow against the executive’s assumption of legislative powers.

But in the shorter, directer term: It would force the Obama administration to go on offense, suing the states to enforce a law that isn’t a law. And I don’t think that case can be made.

5 posted on 12/27/2014 11:00:40 AM PST by Liz (Pres Reagan on govt shutdown: "Let's close it down and see if anyone notices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Liz

a wonderful Kwanza Present for Obie!!


7 posted on 12/27/2014 11:07:01 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Liz; Old Sarge; Mossad1967; brucecw; EnigmaticAnomaly; KylaStarr; Califreak; kalee; milford421; ...
Quote:

OBAMA CALCULATEDLY SKIRTED THE LAW AND SIGNED TWO "MEMOS" TO LAUNCH AMNESTY: Nullification means power to the states and power to the people.

ACTION NOW: Write your governor; call your state attorney general.

The judiciary has consistently ruled against the nullification doctrine, asserting its unique, judicial right to declare laws unconstitutional.

But this executive order isn’t a law. And given its extremely shaky legal footing, it isn’t difficult to imagine a federal bench recognizing the states’ right to disregard federal orders that don’t clearly have the force of law.

And that would be a tremendous — tremendous — blow against the executive’s assumption of legislative powers.

But in the shorter, directer term: It would force the Obama administration to go on offense, suing the states to enforce a law that isn’t a law. And I don’t think that case can be made.

Thanks, Liz.

11 posted on 12/27/2014 11:19:18 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

Indeed. WE must hold their feet to the fire. I am all in for Article V action


32 posted on 12/27/2014 4:44:51 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Liz; sickoflibs; hal ogen; markomalley
ACTION NOW: Write your governor; call your state attorney general.

I could write my new governor, Larry Hogan. Writing my current governor would be a waste of time.

35 posted on 12/27/2014 7:04:59 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The mods stole my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

For being a lawyer he’s confused he makes his own laws as he wants no wonder he never went into business he would have been broke the first year all he has is a mouth and no brains.


50 posted on 12/28/2014 8:15:04 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

I doubt Piyush ‘Bobby’ Jindal would read my letter, since he is so busy galavanting about the nation, like obama, to do his elected job!


52 posted on 01/01/2015 5:27:39 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson