Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Let's Roll

If the far left wants to discredit someone, why dump precious millions of dollars on paying off 26+ random women from BC’s past to manufacture fake stories, and expose themselves and their families to public ridicule, potential prosecution, lawsuits and counter-lawsuits, just to discredit far-left and black Cosby?

Why risk a split in the otherwise solidly Democratic, left-wing AA left voting bloc?

Why not pick on a nice juicy dangerous target of the far left, such as Ted Cruz?

A payoff of successfully attacking Ted Cruz with false allegations would mean possibly derailing a potential 2016 presidential candidate. The payoff for successfully attacking a rabid leftist aging AA multimillionaire comedian with false allegations seems to me to be about 50 votes. The risks of exposure of such a conspiracy are considerable (if not politically suicidal), and about invariant with respect to each well known public personality.

Care to flesh out your conspiracy theory with plausible motive?


101 posted on 12/28/2014 11:06:17 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: SteveH

Because too many blacks were starting to listen to Cosby.

Doubt if many blacks pay much attention to Cruz but if Cosby tells them to pull up their pants and get a job that is an entirely different situation.

Who says the left won’t attack Cruz too?


106 posted on 12/29/2014 11:42:43 AM PST by Let's Roll (Before it can get any better it has to stop getting worse - vote 4 most conservative available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson