Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VTenigma; upchuck
I think so, too. Other names, "Independent" "Constitution" or even "Conservative" don't deliver the slap in the Establishment's face--

If we had that third party, we could also endorse Republicans who are also conservative.

I am particularly steamed this week at Trey Gowdy. What an act--"flight delay"--what a disappointment. But, he's just another Upstate Ambulance Chaser...

11 posted on 01/08/2015 6:36:58 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Mamzelle; VTenigma; upchuck
The names you propose sound good to us. However, my concern is they might cause an unnecessary knee-jerk, opposite reaction of many middle-of-the-road voters who spend 5-10 minutes out of each multi-year voting cycle thinking about it.

For instance, think of the reaction “Tea Party” causes with many barely informed or easily influenced voters, even though they would likely agree with its broad principles after a careful examination.

Not an expert here, but perhaps something such as the

“Republican Action Party”

That is perhaps more enticing as it presents an immediate contrast to rino’s by offering what most desired; and the acronym is not so bad either.

19 posted on 01/08/2015 8:26:53 AM PST by frog in a pot (Will their Long March end with the ballot box or with the federal judiciary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson