Posted on 01/13/2015 6:14:16 AM PST by wagglebee
Former Deputy Minister of Education Dr. Ben Levin (L), who was arrested in 2013 for making child pornography, attends Toronto Pride in 2013 with Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne.
Ontario’s lesbian Premier, Kathleen Wynne, has specifically requested that the proposed sex-education curriculum slated for all schools next fall include a component teaching kids about giving sexual “consent” from “the very earliest stages.”
Wynne asked the Ministry of Education to “finalize a new health and physical education curriculum that gets at some of the root causes of gender inequality, and starts at the very earliest stages to develop an understanding of healthy relationships and consent,” according to a communication obtained by The Star.
The curriculum was first revealed in 2010 by the then-McGuinty government and immediately buried after a province-wide uprising of concerned parents. The curriculum would have taught children to question their male/female identity, about oral and anal sex, masturbation, and experimental family structures.
Critics said the curriculum, which was developed during the time Wynne served as education minister, contained an explicit homosexual agenda that normalized homosexual activity and relationships. Their concerns about the explicit program were bolstered when the province’s former deputy minister of education Dr. Ben Levin — who oversaw the development of the sex-ed curriculum — was arrested in 2013 in the wake of an international child pornography and child exploitation sting. Levin was charged with making and distributing child pornography as well as arranging for a sexual offense with a child.
Gwen Landolt, national vice-president of REAL Women of Canada, told LifeSiteNews that teaching children about giving consent “presupposes that sexual activity even at the ‘earliest ages’ is alright, providing that you consent.”
Landolt called the sex-ed 'consent' add-on “very worrisome” since it could eventually lead to adults having “access to children, providing the children give their consent.”
“You have the question about the exploitation of adults and young children. You also have the question about homosexuals, namely will this allow them to have access to children, providing the children give their consent?” she said.
Some homosexual activist organizations have worked to lower the legal age whereby a person can give sexual consent as well as normalize adult-child sex. What the average citizen calls pedophilia is called in some homosexual circles an “intergenerational romance” for “minor-attracted adults.”
At a 2011 U.S. conference organized by homosexual group B4U-ACT, activists asserted that “children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult, that “minor-attracted persons” are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society, and that an adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative.”
Dr. Judith Reisman, a professor at Liberty University School of Law, told LifeSiteNews that “pedosadists” within the homosexual movement are moving to “lower the age of consent and to teach children that it is OK for them to consent to having sex with adults.”
“The whole issue is to make children available for sex earlier. The younger the child can give consent, the quicker you can have sex with them that is legal,” she said.
Reisman said Wynne’s sex-ed proposals should be named the “Ben Levin program of sex-education.”
The Ontario Physical and Health Education Association (Ophea), which partners with homosexual organizations such as Queer Ontario and Jer’s Vision, said it was pleased to hear of the adding of a “consent” component to the proposed sex-ed. Ophea executive director Chris Markham told The Star that his group had been “asking for the ministry to look at consent as part of the revision process.”
LifeSiteNews contacted Minister of Education Liz Sandals asking what the ministry envisions by teaching children about how to give sexual consent, but received only a generalized, pre-written response.
A draft of the sex-ed is scheduled to be released in the next two months, The Star reported.
Most homosexual men like young boys anyway and yet again we see another step in their agenda while the ignorant about us keep telling us that their marriage etc doe snot affect us at all
Homosexual man here was driving a school bus and then got caught having a party with 14 year old boys at his house giving them drugs and beer. He and his so called boy friend were reprimanded only to be caught again in an undercover sting targeting child molesters going to meet young boys at their house.
They are mentally sick and used to be treated for this until 3 shrinks came in and said homosexuality was all good.
Many of us have known this but try telling the usual ignorant fools who keep telling us it’s their business how does marriage affect you, bla bla bla
It would be nice if liberaltarians, liberals and communists could wake up to the dangers of this agenda but I won;t hold my breath.
Was in Boston near the common and was walking about when we heard loud noises and music. We headed towards there to see what was going on as we were out for a walk anyway.
We turned the corner and saw a freak show of women dressed as nuns touching each others crotch, men in PVC daisy duke shorts feeling each other asses etc etc.
We got out of there as quickly as we could but try telling your young son back then why men and women are acting like that when he asked us.
Now today our oldest is 17 and knows all about the dangers of their agenda and what their ultimate goal is as does his pals.
Another law liberals, and liberaltarians want to do away with, after all they keep saying why should Govt get in the way of two people having sex even if they are 13 years old.
” Another law liberals, and liberaltarians want to do away with, after all they keep saying why should Govt get in the way of two people having sex even if they are 13 years old.”
I bet these kooks believe an infant can consent.
This gang needs to be on “Dancing With The Stars” ... dancing the Tyburn Jig.
oh I had one liberaltarian on here saying he had no problem with incest.
This gang wants to eliminate the concept of “age of consent”.
Oh, critics said? Only the critics had concerns? Unbelievable.
If these idiots do not repent, I would not want to be in their shoes come judgement day.
Read Matt. 18:6 and Luke 17:2 to see what the Lord says about this abomination.
how about teaching kids to figure out sexual predators looking for the underage, and instead of giving consent, learning how to refuse?
Teaching that is probably illegal in Canada. At best you'd lose your job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.