Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rummyfan
To me, the meaning is clear. It is mocking those who 'stand with Charlie', the apologetic Islamics who will get enraged all over again for having Mohammed on the cover. Of course, is there a caption that identifies that as the prophet? No? So ANY drawing of an Islamic man is now Mohammed?

Tired of all the ch!ckensh!ts in the media who are too scared to show the covers. They're just fine with showing ones which mock the Pope or others, but Islam.. Well, they'll kill you.

4 posted on 01/15/2015 12:38:27 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

possible... that these moderates are actually winking at the destruction, rather than weeping.

irony can go deep sometimes.


6 posted on 01/15/2015 12:41:24 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kingu

I will buy the dedication to “free speech” when we see these allegedly blasphemous cartoons everywhere. Here, the NYT, the Washington Post, my local paper. I mean so many sources across the political spectrum the “Bad Guys” don’t know who to bomb or shoot should publish these cartoons.

If they were worth being killed for, they are worth being seen so people know how little many radical Islamics think is worth killing over.

Every paper of any consequence should reprint them. Give the ragheads so many tergets they don’t know where to go. That is free speech at work. We are seeing self-censored, scared like a rabbit press.


12 posted on 01/15/2015 3:51:58 PM PST by Barkeep99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson