Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/22/2015 8:38:19 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Clint N. Suhks

Nice - take every progressive rule to its ridiculous outcome.


2 posted on 01/22/2015 8:39:53 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Being a Baker sure is fraught with social peril these days.


3 posted on 01/22/2015 8:40:20 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
we accept all humans

Except you.

4 posted on 01/22/2015 8:40:52 AM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Good for the man who is attempting to use their own tactics on them-I doubt that it will work since the system is rigged-I also think it would have been more effective if he’d just tried to have them decorate the cake with the Bible verses which proscribe sodomy/homosexuality-but more power to him for doing anything at all. It’s more than the rest of us, including myself, have done.


5 posted on 01/22/2015 8:42:40 AM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Free Speech.


7 posted on 01/22/2015 8:46:56 AM PST by BAW (My people skills are just fine. It's my tolerance to liberals which needs work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Hey, the rules say that only works ONE WAY!


8 posted on 01/22/2015 8:47:34 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Further proof of “you can’t have your cake and eat it too”.


10 posted on 01/22/2015 8:47:56 AM PST by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

“Cake Shop Faces Legal Action For Refusing to Make Anti LGBT Cake”

No, it does not face any legal action at all.


13 posted on 01/22/2015 8:55:06 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

That’s funny. Senora Silva says she accepts all hoomans as they are.

So if I go in 2 days prior to Mexican Independence Day and say I’m celebrating for America with a cake that says “America Forever, Mexico Never”, she’ll happily bake that too, right?

Because that’s how I are.


15 posted on 01/22/2015 8:55:57 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Seems to me that as a consumer, I am able to order what you have to sell.
If you offer variations to your ‘basic menu’, you, as the shop owner should be able to determine what you will or will not construct.

If you don’t care to ‘construct’ what I want, or demand, I just have to take my business elsewhere.

The reason I don’t(didn’t) drink in Black Bars, Gay Bars, S&M Bars, etc was I decided I didn’t want to or should just go where I am ‘comfortable’.

On the other hand, if your ‘biker club’ already has 2 establishments out on the ‘bypass’, why come and disrupt the little club downtown?

Among others, I belong to the VFW and I do(did) NOT really like people in the place that don’t ‘belong’.

I do NOT belong to the Moose or Elks or Lions, so why should I expect to demand them to accommodate me?

To ‘bolster’ membership, the VFW and Legion (among others) have units called ‘Sons of AL’ and the VFW ‘Mens Auxiliary’
which allow sons of ‘eligible Vets’ to join and use the facilities.

So now, the same clowns that have been ‘laughing at us for serving’, going right down to the dissidents etc are now sitting in the VFW as a member because there Father or Grandfather or even Son served (I have ‘less’ of a problem allowing the Parents of eligible sons ‘join’).


19 posted on 01/22/2015 9:01:20 AM PST by xrmusn ((6/98)those who understand, no explanation needed-Those who don't none will work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

So whichever way you act, you are sued. No way to win here.


20 posted on 01/22/2015 9:26:58 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Mau-mauing the flak catchers. Or, Alinskying the Alinskyites.


21 posted on 01/22/2015 9:37:44 AM PST by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

She doesn’t like to discriminate, so she discriminates? Huh?


22 posted on 01/22/2015 9:38:23 AM PST by chesley (Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

About time. Now lets see the suit make it to court. Not that any business should be taken to court over this sort of thing, but sometimes there needs to be some slap back.


24 posted on 01/22/2015 10:14:33 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I was just reading this, glad you posted.
25 posted on 01/22/2015 10:16:04 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson