Posted on 02/01/2015 8:35:00 AM PST by Kaslin
Hard to miss the recently kerfuffle over the fact that the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, invited the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, to speak to a joint session of Congress. This happened immediately after President Obama’s State of the Union speech where many thought he skirted over the crisis with Iran. The problem is almost all of the analysis has missed the point.
It begins with trying to understand why Speaker Boehner gave the White House only a half-day notice of the invitation. In what was disclosed by the Washington Post, the Speaker previously had been left hanging by the White House. Soon after becoming Speaker in 2011, Boehner had gone through “proper channels” to invite Prime Minister Netanyahu to speak to Congress. Boehner’s chief of staff, Barry Jackson, checked with Obama’s chief advisers. Jackson stated he was left hanging for a month with no response from Obama.
The facts do not seem to be in dispute. As confirmed in Politico, Thomas Donilon, who was Obama’s national security advisor in 2011, recalls Jackson’s call to him. Donilon stated “The Speaker’s office did notify us. I indicated it was their decision. I appreciated them checking with us, but it was our view it was their decision. I don’t think we gave them a judgment one way or the other.”
Then what is in question? Maybe whether there was a response to the first time there was an invitation. And why is there all this hand-wringing about whether Netanyahu should have accepted the invite or the protocol surrounding it?
All of a sudden the foreign policy of this country is only the purview of the executive branch. That is just plain silly. My 25 year-old son figured out the disingenuousness of that position. He quizzed me “What was the main credential that was touted for Senator Joe Biden being chosen as Vice-President by Obama? His foreign policy experience.” My reply was “Wasn’t that the same reason Senator John Kerry was chosen as Secretary of State?” He then said “What about all those people on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations?” To which I said “If Congress has no say on foreign relations, we could save hundreds of millions of dollars from those Congressional members flying around the globe meeting with all those foreign leaders.”
One might say this could have been handled better by Speaker Boehner. But after being dissed by the Administration the first time he invited Netanyahu, it appears that Boehner might have been acting like a gentleman by not calling President Obama on how he handled the first invite. Think about it. The Speaker of the House of Representatives, the person third in line to the Presidency, politely asks to invite the leader of one of our closest allies to speak to Congress and Obama and his staff cannot give them an answer. What hubris.
Here is what should have happened after Boehner announced the invitation. The Administration should have stated they were not consulted on the invite, but they are delighted that the elected leader of our closest ally in a pivotal region of the world was coming to speak to Congress. Then they should have said that they would work with Speaker Boehner and Prime Minister Netanyahu to coordinate a time that President Obama and the Prime Minister could have a face-to-face meeting to further the mutual interests of our two countries.
Instead the Administration pissed and moaned. They decried both the Speaker and the Prime Minister. You would think Boehner had invited Kim Jung Un to address Congress. Just ask yourself, would the Administration had protested if Boehner had invited King Salman, the new king of Saudi Arabia, to address Congress? Would they have yelped about an invitation extended to King Abdullah II of Jordan? How about if Boehner had invited Prime Minister Cameron of Great Britain? The answer is quite obviously they would have applauded such an act even if they felt they were not provided proper deference.
In 1991, the great William F. Buckley took an entire issue of National Review (40,000 words) and wrote a treatise on the actions of Pat Buchanan. In it he analyzed Buchanan’s outsized focus on the activities of Israel. Buckley stated "I find it impossible to defend Pat Buchanan against the charge that what he did and said during the period under examination amounted to anti-Semitism.”
After watching this Administration for six years, I can only come to the same conclusion about President Obama.
Boehner and Netanyahu have done nothing to embarrass the president. The president is the one throwing a public tantrum. He is embarrassing himself and the country right out in public.
All he had to do was say nothing, or even extend a dinner invitation to the prime minister (and actually sit through the entire dinner with him). And not make him enter through the service entrance.
“Haters gonna hate”.
Obama got 78% of the Jewish vote. They can speak to this. When Israel is a pile of nuclear cinders we may then hear from the 78%.
Boehner IS NOT REQUIRED TO NOTIFY THE PRESIDENT.
WHEN ARE PEOPLE GOING TO GET IT ..??????
THREE EQUAL BRANCHES OF GOVT .. THAT MEANS BOEHNER DOES NOT NEED TO BOW AND SCRAPE TO OBAMA TO INVITE ANYBODY TO SPEAK BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS.
Geeeeeeez .. when are people going to get it ..????????
Excellent point, but that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave thinks he is the Emperor and the ignorant agree agree with him
Boner didn’t have to tell obama. But he did. There’s nothing at all for obama to bitch about. Nothing. But his vicious deep seated islamoNazism has come to the fore yet again. He is insulting — and Actually Threatening!!!!!! The guest !!! Imagine that!? Anybody writing a hollywood movie script with such a pathetic hateful destructive man cast as president would have his script immediately rejected as incredible, unbelieveable.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is going to EMBARRASS Obama when he gives his speech.
You said it
Gosh, even if Boehner invited the head of the Muslim Brotherhood or Putin to address congress, Obama wouldn’t have made a hissyfit about it.
Isn’t it time we state the truth that Obama is “Jewphobic?”
- to use the favorite suffix of the left wing (-phobic).
Don’t be too surprised if they just say, “Good riddance. That God stuff is all garbage anyway.”
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
I think the President has done a good job embarrassing himself
Related threads
Citing Constitution, Paul Ryan Defends Israeli Leader’s Address to Congress
Related op-ed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.