Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Contractor: Ford Motor fired me because I oppose gay ‘marriage’
LifeSiteNews ^ | 2/4/15 | Dustin Siggins

Posted on 02/04/2015 12:20:36 PM PST by wagglebee

DETROIT, MI, February 4, 2015 (LifeSiteNews.com) -- A former contractor with Ford Motor Company has sued, saying the auto giant and contracting firm RGBSI violated his civil rights when he was fired for his religious opposition to same-sex "marriage."

In a complaint filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and provided to LifeSiteNews, Thomas Banks said that he was fired after commenting on Ford's policy related to same-sex relationships. According to Banks, Ford invited employees to comment on the policy, which Banks -- who was an employee of RGBSI at the time -- did.

Within two weeks, Banks had met with a Human Resources employee of Ford and been fired by RGBSI. His complaint, which was filed on January 28, 2015, is being represented by the Christian-oriented Liberty Institute.

According to the complaint details, Banks' wrote his comment on Ford’s policy that the company “should be thoroughly ashamed.”

“Endorsing and promoting sodomy is of benefit to no one,” he continued. “This topic is disruptive to the workplace and is an assault on Christians and morality, as well as antithetical to our design and our survival. Immoral sexual conduct should not be a topic for an automotive manufacturer to endorse or promote. And yes-this is historic-but not in a good way. Never in the history of mankind has a culture survived that promotes sodomy. Heterosexual behavior creates life-homosexual behavior leads to death."

According to an e-mail from a RGBSI employee who formally relieved Banks of his job, Ford's Human Resources representative said that Banks' comment violated the Ford anti-harassment policy related to sexual orientation. That policy outlines behaviors that are considered harassing, including but not limited to "jokes or stories that are derogatory toward someone's membership" in a specific group, as well as "degrading comments" or "demeaning or criticizing an individual because of her/his membership in one of these groups..."

Banks was also told in an e-mail that he was "in violation of the RGBSI harassment policy," which says that "harassment of any other protected status...is also prohibited." As part of his complaint, Banks noted that "a careful reading of RGBSI's own policy confirms that its own policies do not even prohibit what it claims is the policy basis for its decision. RGBSI only has a ‘sexual orientation’ policy that applies in New York City, New York. No such policy exists in Michigan, or for Michigan employees."

"It is undisputed that I performed my work, live in, and sent my e-mail while in Michigan. Thus, RGBSI terminated me for stated reasons that have no basis in RGBSI policy," write Banks.

An examination of the e-mails provided to LifeSiteNews about Banks' claims related to RGBSI policies verified the fired employee's statement.

According to Liberty Institute Council Cleve Doty, who represents Banks, both Ford and RGBSI are included in the complaint because "it was Ford that initiated the meeting with Thomas Banks, and said that his comment may have violated company non-discrimination policies."

"He was later informed by the contracting company that he was being released by Ford," said Doty. "[RGBSI] could have kept Mr. Banks on staff, but chose instead to say he violated their non-discrimination policies, and fired him."

"This one is particularly troubling because the guy works for three years, with a clean record, but then gets fired for making one comment in an area asking for comments about company policy -- and he stated his religious beliefs," explained Doty. "Therefore, he was fired for his religious beliefs, which is in violation of federal civil rights law and the U.S. Constitution."

It is not known how quickly the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will respond to Banks' complaint. The Commission's standards on what qualifies as religious discrimination are spelled in detail here, and "religious discrimination" is defined as something that "involves treating a person (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because of his or her religious beliefs."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: automakers; ford; fordmotor; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; liberalfascism; michigan; rgbsi; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Now even disagreeing with the homonazis is unacceptable.
1 posted on 02/04/2015 12:20:36 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; BabaOreally; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.


2 posted on 02/04/2015 12:22:36 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I think most longtime jobbies in Metro Detroit still enjoy the work but over the past 25 years or so, they’ve grown to hate the business.


3 posted on 02/04/2015 12:25:11 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
That's right. You not only, cannot disagree; but, you MUST celebrate. Endorse.

We no longer have 1st Amendment rights in this country; at least not on this particular subject.

4 posted on 02/04/2015 12:25:19 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

According to an e-mail from a RGBSI employee who formally relieved Banks of his job, Ford’s Human Resources representative said that Banks’ comment violated the Ford anti-harassment policy related to sexual orientation. That policy outlines behaviors that are considered harassing, including but not limited to “jokes or stories that are derogatory toward someone’s membership” in a specific group, as well as “degrading comments” or “demeaning or criticizing an individual because of her/his membership in one of these groups...”


From what I read here, this is a guy that is about to be rich.

They asked for his written opinion on a subject and he sent to them his written opinion on the subject.

And the content of his test is not harassment of anyone. He is stating his SOLICITED opinion on the subject and is a victim of civil rights violation.

I really can’t his words could be viewed as harassment without significantly distorting the meaning of english words.

And a question: If a homosexual man asked you what you think of homosexuality, and you told him you thought it was disgusting, would that be harassment on your part? Of course not.


5 posted on 02/04/2015 12:28:57 PM PST by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Ford has in recent time been of the "diversity" persuasion, I think since the swish limey leader they had some years back.
6 posted on 02/04/2015 12:30:27 PM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
And a question: If a homosexual man asked you what you think of homosexuality, and you told him you thought it was disgusting, would that be harassment on your part? Of course not.

Exactly! The man was being asked for his OPINION and nothing more.

When I ask for someone's opinion it is because I am genuinely interested in hearing it, not because I just want to be agreed with. Throughout my life I've changed my mind about a lot of things and a lot of this has been because I am willing to consider what others have to say about it.

7 posted on 02/04/2015 12:32:48 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Henry Ford must be weeping.


8 posted on 02/04/2015 12:33:52 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz
That's right. You not only, cannot disagree; but, you MUST celebrate. Endorse.

Soon we will be like North Korea and not demonstrating the proper level of enthusiasm for the regime's dictates will be a crime.

9 posted on 02/04/2015 12:33:54 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Don’t fall for the facade.

The homos are just the spearpoint.

The warriors’ cause is criminalizing Christianity.

This is a precursor to “no one can buy or sell without the Mark of the Beast”.


10 posted on 02/04/2015 12:34:12 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
The warriors’ cause is criminalizing Christianity.

You are correct. The homosexuals have been used as pawns and nothing more, the end game has ALWAYS been about Satan.

11 posted on 02/04/2015 12:36:27 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Silly me.

All this time, I thought Ford’s goal in life was to make money by selling people cars.

Keep it up, Ford.

I like your cars, but your smarmy fudgepack politics will drive me once again to Japan.


12 posted on 02/04/2015 12:37:08 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Now even disagreeing with the homonazis is unacceptable.

Agree, this is a political beatdown like the ones Paula Dean and that Alberta minister got.

The Alberta minister was vindicated by a Canadian review court, but how many people can bear the legal expense to go there? Is it worth, in dollars and cents, that kind of stretch, to get one's job back? But of course one must fight when rights are clearly invaded by Nazis and thugs.

13 posted on 02/04/2015 12:46:07 PM PST by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house, the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Does this mean I can now fill up my Ford truck by putting the nose in the tail pipe?


14 posted on 02/04/2015 12:49:32 PM PST by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Norway Islamic Leader: ‘Every Muslim’ Wants ‘Death Penalty for Homosexuals’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3254088/posts


15 posted on 02/04/2015 12:51:50 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

The company asked for *his* opinion. He gives *his* opinion. He’s fired for not having the politically correct opinion. Sounds like entrapment.
Who was this guy harassing; the questionnaire?


16 posted on 02/04/2015 12:54:55 PM PST by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Not just “now” - this has been the case for quite some time. The only difference is - disagreement with the Homo-Satanists is punishable as a “hate crime” - termination from your job or worse...


17 posted on 02/04/2015 12:55:06 PM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Jim Robinson

I don’t own a Ford car but if I did, I’d trade it in right now. I destroyed my Penneys card when they began to cater to male homosexuals/lesbians and sent me a catalog with two male homos together on every page, then, sent one with two female lesbians together on every page. I wrote them to remove me from the catalog list because I didn’t want homo/lesbian pictures in my house.

If it comes down to it, I may be put in prison for my Christian beliefs because I’m not changing them. Muslim Obama and his sexual deviants be damned.


18 posted on 02/04/2015 12:55:19 PM PST by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

There is a larger issue here.

The company SOLICITED opinions and then fired him for it.

He harassed no one. he was asked for his opinion and he gave it.

This amounts to a PURGE.

Imagine if they said YOU MUST tell us how you feel about this issue, and you MUST agree with us or else, which is just one step further down this road.

How about you MUST tell us if any of your co-worker’s ever expressed any ‘impure thoughts”


19 posted on 02/04/2015 12:55:40 PM PST by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016 (for 16 years of conservative bliss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Sodas Mountn Man
20 posted on 02/04/2015 1:06:25 PM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson