To: Berlin_Freeper
So the the weak point is the F-18 getting shot down?
2 posted on
02/11/2015 10:13:36 AM PST by
Boiler Plate
("Why be difficult, when with just a little more work, you can be impossible" Mom)
To: Berlin_Freeper
We’re obviously playing the wrong game................
5 posted on
02/11/2015 10:21:04 AM PST by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: Berlin_Freeper; All
6 posted on
02/11/2015 10:26:49 AM PST by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: Berlin_Freeper
I don't get the hype. We built Tomahawk TASM variants in the 1980's Why is this now "new" tecnology? Also MacDac built the Harpoon and the Tomahawk used it's anti-ship guidance system.
Most TASM's were converted to TLAM variants. So, the best I can say is that Tomahawk anti-shiop variants are being reborn.
7 posted on
02/11/2015 10:32:50 AM PST by
pfflier
To: Berlin_Freeper
Its a 1000 mile anti-ship cruise missile.
Why just an anti-ship missile? Seems like there could be multiple uses for it.
8 posted on
02/11/2015 10:40:15 AM PST by
McGruff
(WeÂ’re Leaving Behind A Stable And Self-Reliant Iraq - Barack Obama 2011)
To: Berlin_Freeper
This is a significant accomplishment, said Capt. Joe Mauser, Tomahawk Weapons System (PMA-280) program manager. "It demonstrates the viability of long-range communications for position updates of moving targets. This success further demonstrates the existing capability of Tomahawk as a netted weapon, and in doing so, extends its reach beyond fixed and re-locatable points to moving targets.
To: Berlin_Freeper
If the Navy can perfect the methodology, it would give the service an almost 1,000 nautical mile extension the range of the TLAM of its lethal anti-surface radius for its newer guided missile destroyers, which are not fitted with the services aging RGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship missile.
To: Berlin_Freeper
16 posted on
02/11/2015 11:39:56 AM PST by
gaijin
To: Berlin_Freeper
Doesn’t their slow speed this make them defensible?
China and Russia have some fairly long range anti-shop misslies that are mach 2 or 3 which makes them much harder to shoot down, don’t they?
18 posted on
02/11/2015 11:59:06 AM PST by
skyman
To: Berlin_Freeper
Those pidgin’s had wheels up before the missile got there.
19 posted on
02/11/2015 12:00:36 PM PST by
Rappini
(Veritas Vos Liberabit)
To: Berlin_Freeper
I imagine next generation naval weaponry as very heavy with fleets of drone aircraft, surface and subsurface craft.
Importantly, a UUV submarine, for example, does not have to be particularly quiet as it engages potential targets, and can even use active sonar against them. And if it does not encounter any enemy, it can be picked up at leisure, later.
20 posted on
02/11/2015 12:58:31 PM PST by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Yeah. When I was a kid, we called them Roman candles. Probably what they are going to use.
22 posted on
02/11/2015 1:02:10 PM PST by
RetiredArmy
(MARANATHA, MARANATHA, Come quickly LORD Jesus!!! Father send thy Son!! Its Time!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson