Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Untitled (Strange Title)
Townhall.com ^ | February 15, 2015 | Patrick Michaels

Posted on 02/15/2015 7:05:38 AM PST by Kaslin

Global Science Report is a feature from the Center for the Study of Science, where we highlight one or two important new items in the scientific literature or the popular media. For broader and more technical perspectives, consult our monthly “Current Wisdom.”

On Page 3 of Friday’s Washington Post is (yet another) lurid climate story, this time about mega-droughts of several decades that are going to pop up in the Pacific Southwest around 35 years from now. The findings are based upon the UN’s climate model suite that, according to our presentation to the American Geophysical Union, is in the process of failing, because it just isn’t warming at the rate they project. Here, for example, is a graphic from John Christy and Dick McNider of the University of Alabama-Huntsville, showing the growing disparity.

The work cited in the Post ignores this teensy-weensy little problem and, instead drives the models with the UN’s biggest scenario for future carbon dioxide emissions, something that natural gas, which emits much less carbon dioxide than coal when used for electrical generation, is in the process of burying.

But it gets worse.

Droughts in the Pacific Southwest are usually broken by the big pacific climate oscillation known as El Niño. They occur every four to eight years or so. So, in order to have decades of drought, there has to be decades without El Niños.

The overdriven, overheated climate models used in this study cannot simulate them with any degree of realism.

That’s why, in the Post article, study co-author Toby Ault

had a word of caution. Weather conditions can vary, climate impacts can be mitigated, and the warnings of the study might not come to pass. A single El Niño weather pattern in the West could interrupt periods of prolonged drought.

At least younger climate scientists like assistant professor Ault are getting wiser. The fates willing, he’s going to live another 35 years, and we hope much longer. And when those pesky El Niños (along with many other potential co-conspirators) destroy the forecast of gloom and doom, he’ll be able to say that he warned that could happen, because the models his team used didn’t have a good handle on them.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: climatechange; draught; globalwarming; washingtoncompost

1 posted on 02/15/2015 7:05:38 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

OK!! Everybody pay attention!

Lesson for today:

1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.

2. The sun is a ball of fire that controls the climates of all its planets.

3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.

4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.

5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.

Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?


2 posted on 02/15/2015 7:11:41 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily

First they’ll control The Son, then the sun...


3 posted on 02/15/2015 7:29:43 AM PST by null and void (People who deny history are trying to recreate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abclily
The Sun is one of the Earth Planets?

Genius: Where did you get this from?

The Sun is not a planet, it is a star. Earth does not have a planet, neither do the other planets

4 posted on 02/15/2015 7:45:41 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abclily

“Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?”

The answer is that their goal is not to control the sun but to control U.S. citizen’s tax dollars to create a industry based of off a myth and massaged science that they can profit from.


5 posted on 02/15/2015 7:47:00 AM PST by M.A.Meddybemps (Remember Mississippi! Eh-Yup!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Climate models can’t accurately predict three days out, but we’re to believe they can accurately predict thirty to fifty years out.


6 posted on 02/15/2015 9:06:54 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Did you read #3 in reverse?


7 posted on 02/15/2015 12:33:34 PM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson