Skip to comments.Dinesh Was Right – Obama Forming Global Caliphate
Posted on 02/20/2015 12:27:58 AM PST by Mozilla
The reason the federal government went after DSouza so forcefully was that Dinesh, in his first movie 2016: Obamas America, hit the nail right on the head regarding our Dear Leaders agenda. Obama could not let this continue. He had to attempt to silence Dinesh and buy more time to complete his goalthe creation of a global Islamic caliphate.
The evidence is just too overwhelming. There is no other conclusion any intelligent, thinking man can come to.
The goal of this administration is to weaken American power so the United States cannot stop the formation of the caliphate from North Africa to Pakistan. Even more frightening is that Obama is attempting to radically change the population of the United States through illegal immigration so that eventually, a Muslim U.S.A. will join his new kingdom.
I have written again and again about the Obama administrations agenda to allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon to destroy Israel and bring the entire Levant into the caliphate. Israeli nuclear weapons stand in the way of this goal. A nuclear Iran will destroy the Jewish State.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
Clinton and Obama got a lot of campaign money from foreign sources and no one gave a damn.
Dinesh isn’t afraid of Obama, which is much more than I can see for congress.
I doubt that the democrats, outside of a small number in the the Black Caucus, knew that Obama's goal in transforming America was to form a global Caliphite. I doubt that most democrats or republicans even knew what the Caliphite is back then. The Dems and the MSM threw their support to Obama out of white guilt and the belief that he would transform America into a socialist state of the Europeon model with free everything for everyone, at the expense of the producer class. I do believe there are a small, but growing number of Dems who now realize where Oboma is heading, but they remain silent because they are more concerned about preserving their power and influence, than admitting that Obama is a big mistake.
Is this where we get out the popcorn and watch the world go moslem on TV? The left and the media think its a really big show and fun to watch.
Apparently you know nothing about Churchill and the "Black and Tans."
My last name appears on Irish pubs.
Nevertheless, I do not care about the "Black and Tans" because I am an American and a member of the Anglosphere, which correctly reveres Sir Winston. I don't give a rat's ass about Irish issues.
And you seem like such a nice person /s
I don’t think any of us can know what’s going on in President Obama’s mind, but honestly, what does it matter? I don’t really care if he means well or not, because he’s a walking disaster (for the USA) either way.
Obama is just figurehead of a dangerous Cabal..
The world is forming into major power structures with the US, Russia, and China all dominating an area of the globe in a trilateral fashion. Obama is trying to help a fourth power stake its’ claim in the center of the map...an Islamic caliphate that is in control of the Middle East, the oil fields, and the Mediterranean. Israel is a problem based on that geopolitical reality.
Law would be replaced by Decree and bureaucratic whim.
Thanks for the parallels, arthurus!
LucyT, ping to this comparison by arthurus.
Obama’s campaign disabled the security measures that checked whether online contributions were lawful. The FEC refused to investigate because Obama won, and the winner gets privileges (I believe they actually said something to that effect). An analysis done by non-governmental investigators (IIRC) found that something like 90% of the online contributions (these millions of dollars that we were told were rolling in from the “little people” in America, this vast groundswell of popular support...) were from foreign Muslims.
Why was nobody in the Obama regime investigated for these crimes which make D’Souza’s infractions seem like a speck of sand by comparison?
The FACT is that Obama was funded by Islamists. They put him there for a reason. America ignores that at our own peril - aided by people who want to turn the attention away from that fact to piddles like D’Souza’s infractions.
As long as Obama gets to be Caliph?
Oh barf. Get off your high horse. It was a piddly $20,000 contribution to help a friend and something no one else would have been charged for or had such a punishment given to because of this minor infraction.DSouza put himself in jail.
He consciously and willfully broke well known campaign contribution laws.
He knowingly suborned two personal friends to help him commit felonies.
I have no sympathy for this guy, at all.
As a life long Conservative, I condemn his lack of moral character.
I agree with your sentiment, but not with the case you make. The reason DSouza shouldnt have been charged, and why he shouldnt have pled, is that the law he broke is unconstitutional. It is unconstitutional not because money is speech - talk is cheap - but because money is the press.
I cant get the printing press I would like to have without money. I cant buy the paper and ink that press would need without money. And I cant hire the staff I need to run the newspaper I want without money. To say that I have freedom of the press but that I cant pay money for the things without which no press can be operated is a non sequetur (sp). To say that the money I spend for ink cannot come from any source other than sales of newspapers also makes a mockery of my freedom of the press. All CFR - McCain-Feingold or other - is unconstitutional, root and branch.
As to the issue of requiring that the source of political speech/press be disclosed, that sounds good until you realize that some truths can only be said anonymously or posthumously. The Federalist Papers were published under the name, Publius. The actual authors are known to history as John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison. But it obviously never occurred to anyone that anonymity was illicit or immoral.Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.If the Ninth Amendment means anything, it should certainly mean that what was good enough for the framers and ratifiers - and opponents as well - of the Constitution is good enough for Dinesh DSousa.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
"...who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time;...that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. ""I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"--The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
--Thomas Jefferson, 1786https://www.google.com/webhp?#q=truth%20is%20great%20and%20will%20prevail%20if%20left%20to%20herself
Unbelievable, but the speech below was written in 1899.
The attached short speech from Winston Churchill, was delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. It probably sets out the current views of many, but expresses in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest men of the late19th and 20th centuries. He was a brave young soldier, a brilliant journalist, an extraordinary politician and statesman, a great war leader and British Prime Minister, to whom the Western world must be forever in his debt.
He was a prophet in his own time. He died on 24th January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral. HERE IS THE SPEECH:
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome." - Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.