Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dinesh Was Right – Obama Forming Global Caliphate
Western Journalism ^ | February 19, 2015 | L. Todd Wood

Posted on 02/20/2015 12:27:58 AM PST by Mozilla

The reason the federal government went after D’Souza so forcefully was that Dinesh, in his first movie 2016: Obama’s America, hit the nail right on the head regarding our Dear Leader’s agenda. Obama could not let this continue. He had to attempt to silence Dinesh and buy more time to complete his goal—the creation of a global Islamic caliphate.

The evidence is just too overwhelming. There is no other conclusion any intelligent, thinking man can come to.


The goal of this administration is to weaken American power so the United States cannot stop the formation of the caliphate from North Africa to Pakistan. Even more frightening is that Obama is attempting to radically change the population of the United States through illegal immigration so that eventually, a Muslim U.S.A. will join his new kingdom.

I have written again and again about the Obama administration’s agenda to allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon to destroy Israel and bring the entire Levant into the caliphate. Israeli nuclear weapons stand in the way of this goal. A nuclear Iran will destroy the Jewish State.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: caliphate; dinesh; dsouza; globalcaliphate; islam; obama; obamaislam; traitor; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.


41 posted on 02/20/2015 4:16:40 AM PST by SJackson (“ISIS is now going to regret this … because King Abdullah is not Barack Obama, Rep. Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Clinton and Obama got a lot of campaign money from foreign sources and no one gave a damn.

Dinesh isn’t afraid of Obama, which is much more than I can see for congress.

42 posted on 02/20/2015 4:19:08 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
There are two people at the top, Sultan Obama and his Vizier Jarrett. The relationship is analagous to the relationship between sultan and vizier in the Porte- Istanbul pre Ataturk- and in Cairo of the Mamelukes. The vizier actually runs the government while the sultan plays.
In the old days the sultan spent his time at his hunting lodges or in his harem. This one plays golf and flies off to Hawaii or Africa. The sultans tended to be omnisexual in their practices and their harems could include boys or the boys were just brought in to him off the street.
The vizier runs the government but historically the sultan had ultimate control and when the vizier screwed up and lost territory or embarrassed the sultan or got caught dipping into the sultan's purse, the vizier got strangled in Turkey or halved in Egypt.
43 posted on 02/20/2015 4:19:47 AM PST by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WilliamRobert
I knew this five years ago. Why is it just coming out now. This has always been the Democrats design.

I doubt that the democrats, outside of a small number in the the Black Caucus, knew that Obama's goal in transforming America was to form a global Caliphite. I doubt that most democrats or republicans even knew what the Caliphite is back then. The Dems and the MSM threw their support to Obama out of white guilt and the belief that he would transform America into a socialist state of the Europeon model with free everything for everyone, at the expense of the producer class. I do believe there are a small, but growing number of Dems who now realize where Oboma is heading, but they remain silent because they are more concerned about preserving their power and influence, than admitting that Obama is a big mistake.

44 posted on 02/20/2015 4:20:19 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Is this where we get out the popcorn and watch the world go moslem on TV? The left and the media think its a really big show and fun to watch.

45 posted on 02/20/2015 4:25:43 AM PST by x_plus_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
The Irish are not relevant to this discussion.

Apparently you know nothing about Churchill and the "Black and Tans."

46 posted on 02/20/2015 4:30:21 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Apparently you know nothing about Churchill and the "Black and Tans."


My last name appears on Irish pubs.

Nevertheless, I do not care about the "Black and Tans" because I am an American and a member of the Anglosphere, which correctly reveres Sir Winston. I don't give a rat's ass about Irish issues.

47 posted on 02/20/2015 4:42:15 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

And you seem like such a nice person /s

48 posted on 02/20/2015 4:45:09 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I don’t think any of us can know what’s going on in President Obama’s mind, but honestly, what does it matter? I don’t really care if he means well or not, because he’s a walking disaster (for the USA) either way.

49 posted on 02/20/2015 4:55:27 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Obama is just figurehead of a dangerous Cabal..

50 posted on 02/20/2015 5:34:41 AM PST by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker


51 posted on 02/20/2015 5:36:29 AM PST by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: papertyger


52 posted on 02/20/2015 5:40:00 AM PST by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

The world is forming into major power structures with the US, Russia, and China all dominating an area of the globe in a trilateral fashion. Obama is trying to help a fourth power stake its’ claim in the center of the Islamic caliphate that is in control of the Middle East, the oil fields, and the Mediterranean. Israel is a problem based on that geopolitical reality.

53 posted on 02/20/2015 5:45:40 AM PST by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is. - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

Law would be replaced by Decree and bureaucratic whim.

54 posted on 02/20/2015 5:54:23 AM PST by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: arthurus; LucyT

Thanks for the parallels, arthurus!

LucyT, ping to this comparison by arthurus.

55 posted on 02/20/2015 6:24:58 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Obama’s campaign disabled the security measures that checked whether online contributions were lawful. The FEC refused to investigate because Obama won, and the winner gets privileges (I believe they actually said something to that effect). An analysis done by non-governmental investigators (IIRC) found that something like 90% of the online contributions (these millions of dollars that we were told were rolling in from the “little people” in America, this vast groundswell of popular support...) were from foreign Muslims.

Why was nobody in the Obama regime investigated for these crimes which make D’Souza’s infractions seem like a speck of sand by comparison?

The FACT is that Obama was funded by Islamists. They put him there for a reason. America ignores that at our own peril - aided by people who want to turn the attention away from that fact to piddles like D’Souza’s infractions.

56 posted on 02/20/2015 6:58:09 AM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/ g g)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

As long as Obama gets to be Caliph?

57 posted on 02/20/2015 7:16:55 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47; MinuteGal; zeestephen; papertyger; cynwoody; manc; 9YearLurker
D’Souza put himself in jail.
He consciously and willfully broke well known campaign contribution laws.
He knowingly suborned two personal friends to help him commit felonies.
I have no sympathy for this guy, at all.
As a life long Conservative, I condemn his lack of moral character.
Oh barf. Get off your high horse. It was a piddly $20,000 contribution to help a friend and something no one else would have been charged for or had such a punishment given to because of this minor infraction.
I agree with your sentiment, but not with the case you make. The reason D’Souza shouldn’t have been charged, and why he shouldn’t have pled, is that the “law” he broke is unconstitutional. It is unconstitutional not because “money is speech” - talk is cheap - but because money is the press.

I can’t get the printing press I would like to have without money. I can’t buy the paper and ink that press would need without money. And I can’t hire the staff I need to run the newspaper I want without money. To say that I have freedom of the press but that I can’t pay money for the things without which no press can be operated is a non sequetur (sp). To say that the money I spend for ink cannot come from any source other than sales of newspapers also makes a mockery of my freedom of the press. All CFR - McCain-Feingold or other - is unconstitutional, root and branch.

As to the issue of requiring that the source of political speech/press be disclosed, that sounds good until you realize that some truths can only be said anonymously or posthumously. The Federalist Papers were published under the name, “Publius.” The actual authors are known to history as John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison. But it obviously never occurred to anyone that anonymity was illicit or immoral.

Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

If the Ninth Amendment means anything, it should certainly mean that what was good enough for the framers and ratifiers - and opponents as well - of the Constitution is good enough for Dinesh D’Sousa.

58 posted on 02/20/2015 7:17:21 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
All I need to see is that Comrade Chairman Obumble is more interested in being at war with those who "perver Islam" than he is in preventing FALLIBLE AND UNINSPIRED MEN FROM ASSUMING DOMINION OVER THE FAITH OF OTHERS - like America's founders did.

"...who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time;
 that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. "
--The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
--Thomas Jefferson, 1786

59 posted on 02/20/2015 7:33:10 AM PST by HLPhat (This space is intentionaly blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Unbelievable, but the speech below was written in 1899.

The attached short speech from Winston Churchill, was delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. It probably sets out the current views of many, but expresses in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest men of the late19th and 20th centuries. He was a brave young soldier, a brilliant journalist, an extraordinary politician and statesman, a great war leader and British Prime Minister, to whom the Western world must be forever in his debt.

He was a prophet in his own time. He died on 24th January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral. HERE IS THE SPEECH:

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome." - Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).

60 posted on 02/20/2015 7:37:32 AM PST by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson