Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Net neutrality secrecy: No one knows what the FCC approved (but Google has a good idea)
The Register UK ^ | February 26th, 2015 | Kieren McCarthy

Posted on 02/26/2015 11:15:26 PM PST by hreardon

Despite getting the green light, the exact rules have not been revealed and will remain a mystery for some unspecified length of time. "We will publish the order on our website as soon as next two steps are completed," said FCC chairman Tom Wheeler when quizzed after the vote.

"First, we have to get the dissents in, and second have to look at those dissents - and we are required to be responsive to the dissents. Then we will put it on the web. And at that point also file it with the Federal Register." He refused to give a timeframe for that process.

(Excerpt) Read more at theregister.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fcc; internet; netneutrality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2015 11:15:26 PM PST by hreardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hreardon

Dissent? Like not knowing what’s in it?


2 posted on 02/26/2015 11:35:19 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hreardon

yeah cause Google wants you to buy it’s fiber that is what this is about


3 posted on 02/26/2015 11:56:48 PM PST by thesligoduffyflynns (sligo surf club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hreardon

This is an insane process.


4 posted on 02/26/2015 11:57:20 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
This is an insane process.

hence my "mass insanity" theory.

5 posted on 02/27/2015 12:22:00 AM PST by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hreardon
"Net neutrality secrecy: No one knows what the FCC approved "

There has been a repetitious pattern of this administration to tax successful entities to subsidize failure. That's hardly a secret.
6 posted on 02/27/2015 1:02:20 AM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hreardon; All

What I heard was that for profit corporations will not be able to slow down our service or give sweetheart deals to preferred groups. Why are we against that?


7 posted on 02/27/2015 1:32:26 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Because it introduces government control into what had heretofore a truly free form of communication.

This is nothing new. Back when the printing press was invented in the Middle Ages, the Powers That Be tried to control who printed what.

Recall the case of Martin Luther, the Holy Roman Church, and his 99 theses. He was FORBIDDEN by Pope Leo from printing and distributing the documents, but he did it anyway.


8 posted on 02/27/2015 1:45:49 AM PST by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hreardon

They probably have given themselves the power to tax the Internet. Wouldn’t that be special?

And Congress would never have to vote on taxing the Internet, ever.


9 posted on 02/27/2015 1:55:59 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hreardon

Maybe we should start Bugging Google to release the Regulations online because they probably wrote the damned thing....


10 posted on 02/27/2015 2:06:17 AM PST by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
What I heard was that for profit corporations will not be able to slow down our service or give sweetheart deals to preferred groups. Why are we against that?

If that's all it did, it would require no more than 5 pages. This "rule" is 322 pages long. Like Obamacare, the devil is in the details.

11 posted on 02/27/2015 2:06:40 AM PST by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

” They probably have given themselves the power to tax the Internet. Wouldn’t that be special?

And Congress would never have to vote on taxing the Internet, ever. “

Google and the other Large internet businesses probably wrote themselves in as the “middlemen” to collect internet taxes and then they shave off 10% off the top when they hand it in to the feds or some such crony type deal like that.

Just like how some of the major health insurance companies helped to write a huge chunk of obamacare...

Gee and surprise, surprise...

Treasury won’t explain decision to make $3 billion in Obamacare payments

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3261886/posts

“The U.S. Treasury Department has rebuffed a request by House Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R- Wis., to explain $3 billion in payments that were made to health insurers even though Congress never authorized the spending through annual appropriations.”

Yeah....

I’m sure this FFC reg won’t benefit Google and big Boys AT ALL....

HA HA HA HA

The FSCK-ING JOKE IS ON ALL OF US!


12 posted on 02/27/2015 2:10:41 AM PST by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hreardon

What we have here is a massive executive bureaucracy that legislates massively.


13 posted on 02/27/2015 2:28:29 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Judge Napolitano on Fox belives what the FCC has done will go down in flames when it gets to the courts. I hope he is right.


14 posted on 02/27/2015 2:32:53 AM PST by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DAC21
"Judge Napolitano on Fox belives what the FCC has done will go down in flames when it gets to the courts. I hope he is right."

Yep Definitely! Its Unconstitutional just like Obamacare was...

Oh, wait...

15 posted on 02/27/2015 2:35:04 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

FCC = Federal Communications Czars


16 posted on 02/27/2015 2:37:10 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Because it is always a door to finding a way to limit what sites you can go to, what you may post to and of course you can always get a new bill from government for their expansion for the payment of new taxes and employees with big overpaid retirements we don’t need.


17 posted on 02/27/2015 2:39:14 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hreardon

“Despite getting the green light, the exact rules have not been revealed and will remain a mystery for some unspecified length of time. “We will publish the order on our website as soon as next two steps are completed,” said FCC chairman Tom Wheeler when quizzed after the vote.”

They have to pass it before we can find out whats in it.

Just like any other stool sample.


18 posted on 02/27/2015 2:40:06 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

I’ve read it is [like?] the Universal Service fee on the phone bill, but for everyone on the net. A few MORE bucks a month, times everyone online. Just yet another tax. And government regulation, to grow the beast. IMHO...


19 posted on 02/27/2015 2:42:46 AM PST by W. (Dem0crat-mandated education reform killed American progress. Thanks, morons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

FCC = Fking Communist Control


20 posted on 02/27/2015 2:58:27 AM PST by ImNotLying ("Islam is to humans as rabies is to dogs")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson