Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. is helping China build a novel, superior nuclear reactor
fortune.com ^ | February 2, 2015, 2:48 PM EDT | Mark Halper

Posted on 03/23/2015 7:02:23 AM PDT by ckilmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: The Duke

Don’t worry you can still get all of your cheap Chinese made crap at Wally World.


21 posted on 03/23/2015 3:42:18 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

But they have not done so to reduce CO2...


22 posted on 03/23/2015 6:15:14 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

No. They don’t care about CO2. But they do care about the air pollution they’re choking on.


23 posted on 03/23/2015 8:01:43 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

You’re ignoring the politics that led to us ‘giving’ them the tech. But ‘ok’...


24 posted on 03/23/2015 8:04:43 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Well the USA has been anti nuclear for awhile. So the feds are very very cautious —especially after Fukishima. Too cautious imho. The bad press has been unwarranted.


25 posted on 03/23/2015 8:10:50 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

A trillion $$ in printed money and they couldn’t even table replacing the oldest GE MKI & MKII reactors...long before Fukushima...or after when it made the most sense...

...’infrastructure’ & green cronyism being so much more important.

/s

Cautious my a$$: Feds could care less. Those reactors are the next great ‘crisis’ to further undermine the Constitution.


26 posted on 03/23/2015 9:43:07 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869; ckilmer

“But they have not done so to reduce CO2...”

I believe that China is installing a lot of solar panels largely to provide a market for its factories, so they can achieve some economies of scale. It is industrial planning on their part - an effort to use government subsidies to gain an advantage over competing manufacturers in other countries. They want to dominate the solar panel market.

In my opinion, the big flaw with their approach, is that they are subsidizing the production of a technology that is not yet worth the cost. Current solar panels need to be subsidized to compete with grid electricity - which is to say that it is not competitive. They are wasting part of the value of every dollar that they spend on a less efficient option - malinvestment.

If better nuclear, or fracking or something reduces grid electricity cost in 10 years, that will further weaken the return on investment for older generation solar panels, which usually plan on a 20 year return.

When solar technology matures to something truly cost competitive, it may well be a totally different production process, and the manufacturing capacity that they subsidized could be obsolete.


27 posted on 03/24/2015 1:58:28 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Agreed.


28 posted on 03/24/2015 5:30:26 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

U.S. is helping others.

Fortune has learned that DOE plans to sign a 10-year collaboration agreement with China to help that country build at least one molten-salt machine within the next decade. And in a smaller development, Oak Ridge publicly announced in January that it will advise Terrestrial Energy, a privately held Canadian start-up, on development of a molten-salt reactor that draws on Weinberg designs and on the reactor scheme that briefly hatched at Oak Ridge after Weinberg left....

So, is Hunter Biden connected to Terrestrial Energy?


29 posted on 05/20/2023 1:47:41 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson