Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/27/2015 7:31:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Bill already claims he disagrees with thoseach policies.


2 posted on 03/27/2015 7:35:09 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Anyone that believes this decrepit evil hulk could even respond to anything in social media is an idiot, frankly.

There isn’t one real thing about her we’ve been led to believe. It’s all a concoction and hype.


3 posted on 03/27/2015 7:35:34 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hillary has to throw Bill under the bus.

1. Many Democrats are more liberal than Bill, and Hillary wants to prove how liberal she is.

2. Hillary wants to show that she is independent of Bill, that her presidency would not really be a rerun of the Clinton administration.

3. Hillary wants to have her cake and eat it too. She wants to bring up their co-dependent co-presidency when it suits her, and reject connections to Bill when that suits her.


4 posted on 03/27/2015 7:36:12 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“Bill sends his regrets to all of you that he couldn’t be here with us today, but he had a date.”


5 posted on 03/27/2015 7:36:21 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Why does Hillary saying “America today” hit me as sickening?


6 posted on 03/27/2015 7:36:29 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

bookmark


8 posted on 03/27/2015 7:36:52 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

....”The RFRA simply provides that state or local governments may not “substantially burden” a person’s right to exercise his religion unless there is a “compelling governmental interest” and the government must use the “least restrictive means” to further that interest. It also provides that a person who believes his religious liberty has been violated by a state or local government action may raise that as a claim or a defense in a judicial proceeding. It doesn’t say who would prevail in that proceeding, only that the individual can have his day in court....”

SO. How does this effect Muslims and their choice of sharia law?


10 posted on 03/27/2015 7:41:38 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, like I said on an earlier thread today, I think there is a connection between this and her “Tammy Wynette” comment on “60 Minutes” in 1992.


13 posted on 03/27/2015 7:49:55 AM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("Keeping your stick down used to be a commandment, but not anymore" Harry Sinden, 1988)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Y’know, if I were Bill, I’d steer clear of Hillary!.

She might need “sympathy votes” and what better way to round them up than to suddenly become a bereaved widow?


14 posted on 03/27/2015 7:53:16 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Harpies and predators... combination make in hell...
18 posted on 03/27/2015 7:56:37 AM PDT by GOPJ (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist. - Freeper RipSawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Leftards who compare the sexual preferences of a Homo with the skin color of a black are so exclusively open minded that their brains have fallen out their butts and been flushed away.


19 posted on 03/27/2015 8:02:27 AM PDT by Iron Munro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Uh Oh. How Is Hillary Going to Explain Throwing Bill Under the Bus?

As if any presstitute is gonna bring up the issue. Right...

20 posted on 03/27/2015 8:02:27 AM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Liberals not being able to discriminate against people of faith is discrimination.

OK.


21 posted on 03/27/2015 8:08:29 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

No one who is railing about the Bill has read it or understands what’s in it.

At best, someone who is against it is an extreme bigot.

Whether it’s her knee-jerk reaction to the unknown, a willful ignorance, or an inability to apply even the most basic levels of logic; Hillary is only showing us once again why she is not fit to hold office.


23 posted on 03/27/2015 8:15:01 AM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I don't understand why so many people have a problem with this law. Everyone should have the right to stand on their principals, regardless of whether or not someones feelings are hurt. This law doesn't discriminate against anyone. As a Hoosier I am glad to hear that this law was passed, though it shouldn't have been necessary in the first place. “Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice.” ― Thomas Paine
25 posted on 03/27/2015 8:41:46 AM PDT by jasbd1985
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Her aides work probably send out instructions to various media outlets about he-who-must-not-be-mentioned. And the sad part is that they will comply.


26 posted on 03/27/2015 10:57:18 AM PDT by jmcenanly ("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson