Then it has to go SCOTUS.
2/3 of the country have people that are pretty adamant about having the right to protect themselves, and its ever been thus.
My question stands - this legislation makes it much, much tougher. Why again are you opposed?
SCOTUS can also change.
What SHOULD be is that “Shall not be infringed” should have been enough.
And, again, all it takes is a bunch of idiots and you have your 67.
There needs to be teeth to prevent shenanigans.
A simple 2/3 doesn’t protect enough.
Funny that you focus on me alone out of everyone else who has stated there is an inherent weakness in this bill.