Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“that fails to garner “two-thirds of senators” in support.”

A dem controlled congress like a few years ago would easily have that threshold.
It needs a stronger protection.


2 posted on 03/27/2015 8:59:15 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare

This does seem a bit weak...


3 posted on 03/27/2015 8:59:53 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

“...Shall not be infringed” is a pretty strong protection, even if they don’t pay it any mind.


5 posted on 03/27/2015 9:00:14 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

67 Senators? That’s a pretty high standard. You can’t completely ban Congress passing any law. They pass unconstitutional laws all the time.

This makes it harder - much harder. As such, why NOT be a supporter?


9 posted on 03/27/2015 9:05:40 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson